Detroit Criminal Lawyer, Michigan, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Nathan A. Dodson
About | Practice Areas
Dodson Fowler Williams & Nesi, PLC
18538 Mack Avenue Grosse Pointe, MI 48236» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Practicing With Integrity

We have over 20 years of combined legal experience, we will zealously and happily represent any client who needs our assistance.

800-935-7840
1. Nathan A. Dodson Grosse Pointe, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 2015
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School J.D.
2. AboutDodson Fowler Williams & Nesi, PLC
  Practicing With Integrity
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

David Eric Karson

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce, Custody & Visitation, Civil Rights, Bankruptcy & Debt, DUI-DWI

David Karson is a practicing lawyer in the state of Michigan handling a variety of legal matters.

CONTACT

734-744-5226

10988 Middlebelt Rd, Livonia, MI 48150

David J. Poulton

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Traffic

David Poulton is a practicing lawyer in the state of Michigan. He received his J.D from Michigan State University College of Law in 1998.

CONTACT

800-765-0481

710 N Crooks Rd, Clawson, MI 48017

Nickolas Kenny Hannawa

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Traffic

Nickolas K Hannawa is a successful attorney who has been practicing law in Michigan since 2014. He is also a business and property owner, entrepreneur... (more)

CONTACT

800-817-5321

2909 E Big Beaver Rd, Troy, MI 48083

Ezra N. Goldman

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Business, Litigation, Accident & Injury, Motor Vehicle

A Full Service Law Firm

Our law office is more than just a law office. We have immediate access to CPAs, tax and insurance professionals. Our web of contacts includes docto... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-879-4170

24725 W 12 Mile Road, Southfield, MI 48034

Racine Miller

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Civil & Human Rights, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Estate

Racine Miller is the managing partner of The Michigan Law Firm, PC. Ms. Miller is an experienced litigator and trial attorney, who can proudly claim ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

844-464-3476

135 North Old Woodward Avenue, Birmingham, MI 48009

Nicholas Somberg

✓ VERIFIED

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Nicholas Somberg is a practicing lawyer in the state of Michigan handling criminal defense cases.

CONTACT

248-270-5979

31700 Telegraph Rd, Franklin, MI 48025

Arthur A. Garton

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Car Accident, Personal Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Business

Arthur (Art) A. Garton handles all matters of complex criminal law, family law, personal injury and business/civil litigation. He is one of two Macomb... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-854-6940

38550 Garfield Road, Clinton Township, MI 48038

Valenton Vulaj

✓ VERIFIED

Estate, Accident & Injury, Criminal, Elder Law

Valenton Vulaj is a practicing lawyer in the state of Michigan. Attorney Vulaj received his J.D. from the University of Detroit Mercy in 2000.

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-729-2161

28592 Orchard Lake Rd, Farmington Hills, MI 48334

Nick Balberman

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Bankruptcy & Debt, Estate

CONTACT

248-224-6696

29800 Middlebelt Rd, Farmington, MI 48334

Robert D. Mouradian

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Accident & Injury, Business, Employment, Criminal

Robert D. Mouradian received his undergraduate degree in political science from the University of Michigan in 1974. Robert D. Mouradian graduated f... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-697-1561

17199 N. Laurel Park Dr., Livonia, MI 48152

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recogni... (more...)

A way the defendant can get out of jail, without paying bail, by promising to appear in court when next required to be there. Sometimes called 'personal recognizance.' Only those with strong ties to the community, such as a steady job, local family and no history of failing to appear in court, are good candidates for 'OR' release. If the charge is very serious, however, OR may not be an option.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Detroit Criminal Lawyer, Michigan, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Dodson Fowler Williams & Nesi, PLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

David Eric Karson

David J. Poulton

Nickolas Kenny Hannawa

Ezra N. Goldman

Racine Miller

Nicholas Somberg

Arthur A. Garton

Valenton Vulaj

Nick Balberman

Robert D. Mouradian

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

INFORMED CONSENT

NOLLE PROSEQUI

SPECIFIC INTENT

INTERROGATION

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

OWN RECOGNIZANCE (OR)

BAIL

PLEA BARGAIN

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

People v. Petri

People v. Horn

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details