Connecticut Court Stands By Strict Probate Appeal Deadline

by Joseph C. Maya on Mar. 31, 2017

Estate Estate  Wills & Probate Estate  Trusts 

Summary: Article on Connecticut's strict probate appeals process.

To speak with an experienced probate law attorney, please contact the experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or at JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

In the case of Corneroli v. D Amico, a party appealing to the Superior Court from the Probate Court is required to commence the appeal by filing it with the Superior Court clerk within 30 days of the order, denial or decree and under a 2007 amendment to C.G.S. 45a-186, no motion for permission to appeal need be filed in the Probate Court. Louis Corneroli filed a claim in the Probate Court against the estate of his cousin, Salvatore D Amico, seeking a share of a $2.4 million settlement that the estate received concerning the sale of a John Singer Sargent painting. The decedent had purchased the painting in 1978 for $3 and, until his death in the early 1990s, unsuccessfully attempted to have the painting authenticated.

Following his death, the painting was authenticated. Corneroli claimed that he and the decedent had formed a partnership and he was entitled to 50 percent of the proceeds from the sale of the painting. The administrators of the estate, Louis D Amico and Rita Willis, disputed the allegations and filed a motion to disallow the claim. The Probate Court held a hearing and granted the defendants motion. Plaintiff s counsel received notice of the order on March 28, 2008 and on April 24, 2008 filed a motion for permission to appeal with the Probate Court. On June 4, 2008, the plaintiff filed an appeal in the Superior Court. The defendants moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction claiming that under C.G.S. 45a-186, the appeal was untimely. The trial court granted the motion finding that the appeal was untimely filed as the Probate Court sent notice of its decision on March 27, 2008 but that the plaintiff did not file his appeal in the Superior Court until June 4, 2008, more than 30 days later. The Appellate Court affirmed the trial court s judgment. The right to appeal from a decision of the Probate Court is statutory. Prior to Oct. 1, 2007, an appeal from a judgment of a Probate Court was commenced by motion to that court. P.A. 07-116 repealed provisions regarding the motion to appeal including C.G.S. 45a-191 and 45a-192. After Oct. 1, 2007, C.G.S. 45a-186(a) as amended by P.A. 07-116 requires that any appeal from a Probate Court order, denial or decree, be commenced by filing a complaint in the superior court. The amendment eliminated any previous requirement that an aggrieved party file a motion for permission to file an appeal with the Probate Court to commence the appeal. C.G.S. 45a-186 did not otherwise contain provisions to save the appeal.

If you have any questions or would like to speak to a probate law attorney about a will, trust, or estate matter, please contact the experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or at JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

For continual access to the legal world, follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn. We offer the latest updates on caselaw and legal news. In addition, informational videos are available for your convenience on our YouTube channel. 

Source- 
C.J. Flynn, Probate Court Appeal Requires Superior Court Filing In 30 Days, Conn. Law Trib. (July 28, 2009)

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.