Court Upholds $159,116.10 Verdict for Back Injuries

author by Joseph C. Maya on May. 03, 2017

Accident & Injury Accident & Injury  Personal Injury Lawsuit & Dispute  Lawsuit 

Summary: Blog about a court that upheld a large award of damages given because of severe back injuries.

Contact the personal injury attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. today. We can help you get the just compensation you deserve for your injuries or those of a loved one. For a free initial consultation, call 203-221-3100 or email JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

Defendant's motion for remittitur on personal injury damage award that included $150,000 in non-economic damages failed. The parties had stipulated to the economic damages and evidence that plaintiff suffered a permanent partial disability related to disc herniation and bulges provided sufficient evidentiary underpinning for non-economic damages.

The personal injury action was tried to a jury between November 7 and November 9, 2006. The plaintiff was awarded $9,116.10 in economic damages and $150,000.00, for a sum of $159,116.10. The defendant filed a motion for remittitur on the ground that the awarded damages were excessive as a matter a law. The plaintiff had suffered a cervical injury and disc herniation at the L4-5, with disc bulges as L2-3 and L3-4 and disc herniation at the L4-S1 vertebrae. An expert gave the plaintiff a 6% partial permanent disability to her cervical spine, and an 8% partial permanent disability to her lumbar spine. The plaintiff continues to be in pain and must enlist others to help with some of her daily responsibilities. The court found this to be sufficient evidence to support the jury’s conclusion as to both the economic and non economic damages. There was no basis for the court to conclude such a verdict was without an evidentiary underpinning, or the product of partiality, prejudice, mistake or corruption.

At Maya Murphy, P.C., our personal injury attorneys are dedicated to achieving the best results for individuals and their family members and loved ones whose daily lives have been disrupted by injury, whether caused by a motor vehicle or pedestrian accident, a slip and fall, medical malpractice, a defective product, or otherwise. Our attorneys are not afraid to aggressively pursue and litigate cases and have extensive experience litigating personal injury matters in both state and federal courts, and always with regard to the unique circumstances of our client and the injury he or she has sustained.

Source: Perez v. Brokaw, 2007 Conn. Super LEXIS 117 (Conn. Super. 2007)

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.