Drunk Driver's Sloppy Parking Results in DUI Conviction

by Joseph C. Maya on Apr. 21, 2017

Accident & Injury Accident & Injury  Car Accident Criminal  DUI-DWI 

Summary: Blog post a drunk driver who was given a DUI after illegally parking while under the influence of alcohol.

For a free consultation with an experienced criminal defense attorney, please call the offices of Maya Murphy, P.C. today at (203) 221-3100 or Joseph C. Maya, Esq. at JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

In the case of State v. Higgins, the state charged a driver with operating under the influence (DUI).Under Connecticut law, the driver moved to suppress evidence related to his detention and arrest on those charges. The driver argued that the police officers lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause to place him under arrest and therefore any evidence obtained incident to his arrest was to be suppressed.

The trial court found, based on the totality of the circumstances, that the trooper, who had four years of experience and training in DUI enforcement, had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the driver was engaged in criminal activity, i.e., DUI. The trooper had just interviewed defendant in relation to the illegally parked vehicle and told him to move the car or it would be towed. The trooper observed at that time that the driver appeared to be intoxicated. When the trooper next encountered the vehicle exiting the road, he clearly observed the driver operating the vehicle. The trooper noted that the driver appeared to be highly intoxicated, had trouble standing, was belligerent, and slurred his words. There was a strong odor of alcohol. The trooper clearly had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the driver was driving while intoxicated.

The trial court denied the motion. “The court concludes, based on the totality of the circumstances, that the trooper had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that [the driver] was engaged in criminal activity, i.e., operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol” said the court. “The trooper had just interviewed [the driver] in relation to the illegally parked vehicle. The trooper had observed at that time that [the driver] appeared to be intoxicated. When the trooper next encountered the vehicle exiting the road, he clearly observed [the driver] now driving the vehicle. The trooper clearly had a reasonable and articulable suspicion that [the driver] was driving while intoxicated.”

Maya Murphy P.C. has the resources and expertise to offer you the best possible representation throughout the criminal process. If you are facing criminal charges or wish to appeal your case, please call the offices of Maya Murphy, P.C. today at (203) 221-3100 or Joseph C. Maya, Esq. at JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

Source: State v. Higgins, 2003 Conn. Super. LEXIS 1905, 2003 WL 21675877 (Conn. Super. Ct. July 1, 2003)

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.