Parties’ High Conflict Divorce Results in Emotional Neglect

by Joseph C. Maya on Mar. 14, 2024

Divorce & Family Law 

Summary: In a case involving the Department of Children and Families, the Court removed a child from her home because of the emotional strain the parties’ high conflict post judgment divorce proceedings placed on her.  The parties were divorced in 2009 and had joint custody of their daughter, with the mother having primary physical custody.  According to the Court, after their divorce, the parents fought incessantly and used the child as a means of obtaining or denying access to the other.  The child, who was fifteen years old during the proceedings, did not want to live with either parent due to their constant fighting.

At trial the child’s therapist testified that the child was chronically depressed due to the ongoing conflict between her parents.  He described the child as sad, lonely, frustrated and angry.  According to the counselor, the ongoing relationship between the mother and father prevented the child from feeling stable, coping with her own feelings or grieving the loss of family unity.

Although the therapist attempted to counsel the parents, they would not accept responsibility for the harm they inflicted on the child.  Rather, they blamed each other.  After expressing suicidal thoughts during her last visit, the child was taken to a local hospital for observation and subsequently began a period of partial hospitalization treatment.

The Court’s Decision

After hearing the testimony of several other therapists and counselors involved with the family, the Court found that the extent to which the two parents deliberately placed their child in the middle of their conflict not only defied the very essence of parenthood, but also placed the child in a position of believing that death was her only avenue of relief.

The Court further found that having created “a literal tsunami of hatred with the child in the middle of its path,” the child was torn between the natural love and affection she had for her parents and the hatred she had for the emotional scars they inflicted on her.  The Court ultimately concluded that the parents drove the child to a point where she needed sanctuary in the home of a non-relative where she could feel as though she were a priority.


Maya Murphy P.C. has proudly been included in the 2024 Edition of Best Law Firms®, ranked among the top firms in the nation. In addition, Managing Partner Joseph C. Maya has been selected to The Best Lawyers in America® 2024 for his work in Employment Law and Education Law in Connecticut. Recognition in Best Lawyers® is awarded to firms and attorneys who demonstrate excellence in the industry, and is widely regarded by both clients and legal professionals as a significant honor.

Our firm in Westport, Connecticut serves clients with legal assistance all over the state, including the towns of: Ansonia, Beacon Falls, Bethany, Bethel, Branford, Bridgeport, Brookfield, Cheshire, Danbury, Darien, Derby, East Haven, Easton, Fairfield, Greenwich, Guilford, Hamden, Madison, Meriden, Middlebury, Milford, Monroe, Naugatuck, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Haven, Newton, North Branford, North Haven, Norwalk, Orange, Oxford, Prospect, Redding, Ridgefield, Seymour, Shelton, Sherman, Southbury, Stamford, Stratford, Trumbull, Wallingford, Waterbury, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wilton, and Woodbridge. In addition to assisting clients in Connecticut, our firm handles education law and employment law matters in New York as well. 

If you have any questions about employment law or education law in Connecticut, or would like to speak to an attorney about a legal matter, please contact Joseph C. Maya and the other experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or JMaya@Mayalaw.com to schedule a free initial consultation today.

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.