Alameda Criminal Lawyer, California, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jo-Anna Nieves
About | Practice Areas
The Nieves Law Firm
505 14th St. Ste. 900 Oakland, CA 94612Â» view map
Criminal Defense
We Take The Criminal Out Of Criminal Defense

We are energetic, creative, and aggressive in our efforts to extricate you from your situation and help you get your life back on track.

800-681-5480
1. Jo-Anna Nieves Oakland, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 2011
  Florida State University J.D. 2011
2. AboutThe Nieves Law Firm
  When you are charged with a criminal offense, you need a strong, experienced, and committed advocate.
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Charles Jason Simpson Woodson

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

725 Washington St, Oakland, CA 94607

Kathleen Mary Scheidel

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

1111 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94607

Rachel L. Johnson

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

Oakland, CA 94623

Matthew Charles Baron

Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Insurance, Credit & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

Oakland, CA 94604

Keith Harris Lynch

Litigation, Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

505 14th Street, Oakland, CA 94612

Colin Troy Bowen

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

1 Frank H Ogawa Plz, Oakland, CA 94612

Jennifer Nicole Matthews Logue

Public Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

1 Frank H Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612

Catherine Lenore Anderson

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

1624 Franklin St, Oakland, CA 94612

Gabriela Monserrat Lopez Arcos

Immigration, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

1720 Broadway Ave, Oakland, CA 94612

Dennis Julian Roberts

Criminal, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 60 Years

CONTACT

370 Grand Avenue, Oakland, CA 94610

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BAILOR

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in or... (more...)

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in order to get it fixed would be a bailor.

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Albillar

... Code, Â§Â§ 261, subd. (a)(2), 264.1), forcible sexual penetration while acting in concert (id., Â§Â§ 289, subd. (a)(1), 264.1), and active participation in a criminal street gang (id., Â§ 186.22, subd. (a)). The jury further found that the sex ...

In re Lawrence

... 1189 Carrie L. Hempel, Michael J. Brennan and Heidi L. Rummel for Petitioner Sandra Davis Lawrence. Munger, Tolles & Olson, Blanca F. Young and Hailyn J. Chen for Stanford Criminal Justice Center as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner Sandra Davis Lawrence. ...

People v. Vazquez

... (b)-(d)), and that he committed the murder for the benefit of, at the direction of, and in association with a criminal street gang (Â§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C)). Appellant was sentenced to a total term in state prison of 50 years to life. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Alameda Criminal Lawyer, California, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

The Nieves Law Firm

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Charles Jason Simpson Woodson

Kathleen Mary Scheidel

Rachel L. Johnson

Matthew Charles Baron

Keith Harris Lynch

Colin Troy Bowen

Jennifer Nicole Matthews Logue

Catherine Lenore Anderson

Gabriela Monserrat Lopez Arcos

Dennis Julian Roberts

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BAILOR

HOMICIDE

IMPEACH

SPECIFIC INTENT

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

GRAND JURY

FEDERAL COURT

JURY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Albillar

In re Lawrence

People v. Vazquez

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details