Berkley Criminal Lawyer, Michigan, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Steven Shelton
About | Practice Areas
Shelton Legal Services, PLLC
110 Trealout Dr Ste 201 Fenton, MI 48430Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Someone On Your Side

When it comes to dealing with the law, you shouldnâ€™t do it on your own. You need someone on your side.

800-619-4260
1. Steven Shelton Fenton, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 2005
  Thomas Cooley Law School J.D. 2005
2. AboutShelton Legal Services, PLLC
  We provide legal representation with the highest ethical standards.
3. Practice AreasSpecializations
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Articles
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Scott Robert Reizen

Industry Specialties, Criminal, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

28000 Woodward Ave, Royal Oak, MI 48067

Matthew Robert Roman

Criminal, Business, Real Estate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

1573 Penistone St, Birmingham, MI 48009

Matthew J. Catchick

Other, Motor Vehicle, Divorce, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

29829 Greenfield Rd, Southfield, MI 48076

Mitchell Ribitwer

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

26862 Woodward Ave, Royal Oak, MI 48067

Jerome Sabbota

Other, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

26862 Woodward Ave, Royal Oak, MI 48067

Marina Liane Chupac

Juvenile Law, Traffic, Deportation, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

1719 Crooks Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48067

James Warren Amberg

Federal Appellate Practice, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

32121 Woodward Ave, Royal Oak, MI 48073

Mark W. Peyser

Litigation, Criminal, Business, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

450 W 4Th St, Royal Oak, MI 48067

Eric Lee Pernie

Other, Real Estate, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

1000 S Old Woodward Ave, Birmingham, MI 48009

Matthew A. Fraiberg

Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

1000 S Old Woodward Ave, Birmingham, MI 48009

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Berkley Criminal Lawyer, Michigan, page 5

Sponsored Law Firm

Shelton Legal Services, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Scott Robert Reizen

Matthew Robert Roman

Matthew J. Catchick

Mitchell Ribitwer

Jerome Sabbota

Marina Liane Chupac

James Warren Amberg

Mark W. Peyser

Eric Lee Pernie

Matthew A. Fraiberg

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

SELF-DEFENSE

NOLO CONTENDERE

JURY NULLIFICATION

MENS REA

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

BAIL

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

People v. Petri

People v. Horn

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details