Entiat Criminal Lawyer, Washington, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

James Hill
About | Practice Areas
Russell & Hill, PLLC
1212 North Washington St. Suite 132 Spokane, WA 99201» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Professional, Personal, Proven

You have questions, and we have answers. Here at Russell & Hill, PLLC, we know how to obtain the most favorable outcome for your particular circumstances.

800-928-5340
1. James Hill Spokane, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 2001
  Seattle University J.D. 2001
2. AboutRussell & Hill, PLLC
  Professional, Personal, Proven
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Frank Jay Brandt

Immigration, Employment Discrimination, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

2007 Woodridge St, Wenatchee, WA 98801

Tyler D Hotchkiss

Criminal, Elder Law, Civil Rights, Personal Injury, Mass Torts

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

124 N Wenatchee Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801

Michael Glenn Bradford

Commercial Real Estate, Immigration, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

617 Washington St, Wenatchee, WA 98801

Nicole Hankins

State Government, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Merger & Acquisition

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

1 S Chelan Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801

Justin William Titus

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

CONTACT

23 S Wenatchee Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801

Sean Esworthy

Traffic, Domestic Violence & Neglect, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

435 Orondo Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801

Andrew Perry Melton

Other, Traffic, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

23 S Wenatchee Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801

Allen Franklin Blackmon

Litigation, Constitutional Law, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

350 Orondo Avenue, Wenatchee, WA 98801

Elizabeth Halls

Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

23 S Wenatchee Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801

Anthony J. Di Tommaso

Federal, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

23 S Wenatchee Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

FELONY

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases... (more...)

A serious crime (contrasted with misdemeanors and infractions, less serious crimes), usually punishable by a prison term of more than one year or, in some cases, by death. For example, murder, extortion and kidnapping are felonies; a minor fist fight is usually charged as a misdemeanor, and a speeding ticket is generally an infraction.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Entiat Criminal Lawyer, Washington, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Russell & Hill, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Frank Jay Brandt

Tyler D Hotchkiss

Michael Glenn Bradford

Nicole Hankins

Justin William Titus

Sean Esworthy

Andrew Perry Melton

Allen Franklin Blackmon

Elizabeth Halls

Anthony J. Di Tommaso

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BAIL

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

ARREST

IMPRISON

JURY NULLIFICATION

VENIREMEN

FELONY

BURDEN OF PROOF

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details