North Bend Juvenile Law Lawyer, Washington, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

James Hill
About | Practice Areas
Russell & Hill, PLLC
1212 North Washington St. Suite 132 Spokane, WA 99201» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Professional, Personal, Proven

You have questions, and we have answers. Here at Russell & Hill, PLLC, we know how to obtain the most favorable outcome for your particular circumstances.

800-928-5340
1. James Hill Spokane, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 2001
  Seattle University J.D. 2001
2. AboutRussell & Hill, PLLC
  Professional, Personal, Proven
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Jonathan William Milstein

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Civil Rights, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

11335 Ne 122Nd Way, Kirkland, WA 98034

Michael J. Lambo

Traffic, Juvenile Law, Criminal, Private Judging

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

Kirkland, WA 98034

Veronica Alexis Quinonez

Juvenile Law, Dispute Resolution, Lawsuit & Dispute, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

14900 Interurban Ave S, Seahurst, WA 98168

Karen Lynn Mitterer

Juvenile Law, Disability, Education

Status: Deceased Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

9721 112Th Ave Ne, Kirkland, WA 98033

Peter Carl Lawson

Juvenile Law, Other

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

14241 Ne Woodinville Duvall Rd, Woodinville, WA 98072

Patrick Kelly Dowd

Juvenile Law, State Government, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

6840 Fort Dent Way, Seattle, WA 98188

Elizabeth Claire Bokan

Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

6840 Fort Dent Way, Seattle, WA 98188

Michael George Sandona

Contract, Civil Rights, Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: Inactive Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

12719 102Nd Ave Ne, Kirkland, WA 98034

Nancy Ann Beckford

Other, Workers' Compensation, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

16212 Bothell Everett Hwy, Bothell, WA 98012

Terri Lynn Stickney

Malpractice, Juvenile Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: Inactive Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

22116 7Th Pl W, Bothell, WA 98021

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Chavez

... C. JOHNSON, J. Â¶ 1 This case asks us to determine whether a juvenile charged with a ... As a result, two psychological experts were appointed, one for the State and one for the defense, and both opined that Chavez would be better served if he remained in the juvenile system. ...

State v. Torngren

... Mr. Torngren and the State disagreed on the proper offender scores for his sentence. Mr. Torngren's criminal history consisted of 12 prior offenses. It included two juvenile adjudications from 1994 for third degree assault and attempted second degree robbery. ...

State v. MC

... Another statute provides that a victim penalty assessment shall be imposed when "any juvenile is adjudicated of any offense in any juvenile offense disposition under Title 13 RCW." RCW 7.68.035(1)(b). Because a deferred disposition is not a "juvenile offense disposition," the ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

North Bend Juvenile Law Lawyer, Washington, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Russell & Hill, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jonathan William Milstein

Michael J. Lambo

Veronica Alexis Quinonez

Karen Lynn Mitterer

Peter Carl Lawson

Patrick Kelly Dowd

Elizabeth Claire Bokan

Michael George Sandona

Nancy Ann Beckford

Terri Lynn Stickney

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-DEFENSE

CRIMINAL LAW

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

FEDERAL COURT

JUSTICE SYSTEM

JURY NULLIFICATION

PLEA

MISTRIAL

DIRECTED VERDICT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Chavez

State v. Torngren

State v. MC

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details