Court Dismisses Negligence Claim for Physical Education Debacle

author by Joseph C. Maya on May. 01, 2017

Accident & Injury Accident & Injury  Personal Injury Lawsuit & Dispute  Lawsuit 

Summary: Blog post about a negligence claim against a school being dismissed due to improper pleadings.

Contact the personal injury attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. today. We can help you get the just compensation you deserve for your injuries or those of a loved one. For a free initial consultation, call 203-221-3100 or email JMaya@Mayalaw.com.

Plaintiff, an alleged injured minor, was injured during a mandatory hockey game during her school’s physical education class. The plaintiff alleged that the injury occurred when another student tripped her by negligently placing a hockey stick in from on the plaintiff’s feet. The injured minor sought to hold the alleged negligent minor liable for negligently tripping her with a hockey stick during a floor hockey game. The alleged negligent minor and her mother moved to strike the complaint as it pertained to them. The counts were withdrawn as to the alleged negligent minor's mother.

As allegations of reckless or intentional conduct on the part of a co-participant were necessary to plead a cause of action for injuries sustained by a participant in a team contact sport and proof of mere negligence would not suffice, the negligence counts were struck as to a minor in regard to injuries sustained at school during a hockey game.

The alleged injured minor claimed to have been injured while participating in a mandatory floor hockey game which took place during a physical education class. She alleged that the alleged negligent minor negligently tripped her, despite the fact that the alleged negligent minor knew or should have known that pushing the hockey stick out in front of her would cause her to fall. She further alleged that the alleged negligent minor was negligent in that she failed to pay attention, with regard to the hockey stick she was running with, and negligently failed to warn the injured minor of the imminent contact. It was contended that the negligence counts were legally insufficient because mere negligence was insufficient to permit recovery for an injury sustained in a team sport. The court held that normal expectation of a participant in a floor hockey game would be to come into contact with another participant or another participant's hockey stick. Allegations of reckless or intentional conduct on the part of the co-participant were therefore necessary to plead a cause of action for injuries sustained by a participant in a team contact sport. Proof of mere negligence would not suffice. The motion to strike the counts against the alleged negligent minor was granted.

At Maya Murphy, P.C., our personal injury attorneys are dedicated to achieving the best results for individuals and their family members and loved ones whose daily lives have been disrupted by injury, whether caused by a motor vehicle or pedestrian accident, a slip and fall, medical malpractice, a defective product, or otherwise. Our attorneys are not afraid to aggressively pursue and litigate cases and have extensive experience litigating personal injury matters in both state and federal courts, and always with regard to the unique circumstances of our client and the injury he or she has sustained. 

Please contact Joseph C. Maya, Esq., at 203-221-3100, or at JMaya@mayalaw.com, to schedule a free consultation.

Source: Lenti v. Jacobson, 2009 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2985 (Conn. Super. Ct Nov. 06, 2009)

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.