Prenuptial Agreements Invalidated Where Spouse Drafted Prenup in Foreign Language

author by Joseph C. Maya on Mar. 21, 2024

Divorce & Family Law 

Summary: In a post-judgment divorce action involving prenuptial agreements, the Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport found that two prenuptial agreements offered during a dissolution proceeding were unenforceable. One document did not conform to a knowledge requirement regarding monetary amounts, while the second was written in a language the plaintiff could not understand, and neither was the plaintiff represented by counsel.

Case Background

The plaintiff, wife, and defendant, husband, were married in August 2003 in Lebanon and moved to Fairfield, Connecticut, shortly after. The husband owned two businesses and managed all household expenses and income, while the wife, who is fluent in both Arabic and French, obtained work as a French language tutor several years after the move. The wife was unaware of her husband’s income. The parties separated in 2009, prompting the husband to permanently relocate to Lebanon, but not before making the wife leave the marital home.

At a limited contested trial, the wife offered two documents referenced as prenuptial agreements. The first was a “marriage confessional contract,” a document required under Lebanese law, which included a pre-paid dowry and a deferred dowry. The monetary amounts are usually jointly decided by the parties to the marriage, yet in this case, the husband chose the monetary amounts by himself.

The second document was a “Prenuptial Agreement” prepared in English, which waived any and all claims by the wife to alimony, support, or her husband’s assets. The wife testified that she could neither read nor write English and believed she was signing papers that would allow her entry into the United States. Furthermore, the wife was not represented by counsel at any time during the preparation and execution of both documents.

Enforceability of Antenuptial Agreements

Antenuptial agreements relating to the rights of parties to property upon the dissolution of marriage are generally enforceable when three conditions are met. The contract must be validly entered into, its terms must not violate statute or public policy, and the circumstances of the parties at the time of marital dissolution are not so beyond the contemplation of the parties at the time the contract was entered into making enforcement unjustified. Courts will inquire whether any waiver of statutory or common-law rights was made knowingly and voluntarily. Finally, each party shares the duty to disclose the amount, character, and value of individually owned property, absent independent knowledge by the other party.

The Court’s Decision

In this case, the court found that neither document was enforceable. With respect to the first document, the wife had no actual knowledge of what assets were available to the husband when he decided upon the monetary amounts on his own. As to the second document, it was written in a language the wife could not read or write, and even if she could understand the contract, she had no opportunity to review it with counsel. As such, neither prenuptial agreement was legally enforceable.


Maya Murphy P.C. has proudly been included in the 2024 Edition of Best Law Firms®, ranked among the top firms in the nation. In addition, Managing Partner Joseph C. Maya has been selected to The Best Lawyers in America® 2024 for his work in Employment Law and Education Law in Connecticut. Recognition in Best Lawyers® is awarded to firms and attorneys who demonstrate excellence in the industry, and is widely regarded by both clients and legal professionals as a significant honor.

Our firm in Westport, Connecticut serves clients with legal assistance all over the state, including the towns of: Ansonia, Beacon Falls, Bethany, Bethel, Branford, Bridgeport, Brookfield, Cheshire, Danbury, Darien, Derby, East Haven, Easton, Fairfield, Greenwich, Guilford, Hamden, Madison, Meriden, Middlebury, Milford, Monroe, Naugatuck, New Canaan, New Fairfield, New Haven, Newton, North Branford, North Haven, Norwalk, Orange, Oxford, Prospect, Redding, Ridgefield, Seymour, Shelton, Sherman, Southbury, Stamford, Stratford, Trumbull, Wallingford, Waterbury, West Haven, Weston, Westport, Wilton, and Woodbridge. In addition to assisting clients in Connecticut, our firm handles education law and employment law matters in New York as well. 

If you have any questions about employment law or education law in Connecticut, or would like to speak to an attorney about a legal matter, please contact Joseph C. Maya and the other experienced attorneys at Maya Murphy, P.C. at (203) 221-3100 or JMaya@Mayalaw.com to schedule a free initial consultation today.

Legal Articles Additional Disclaimer

Lawyer.com is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice. Content posted on Lawyer.com is the sole responsibility of the person from whom such content originated and is not reviewed or commented on by Lawyer.com. The application of law to any set of facts is a highly specialized skill, practiced by lawyers and often dependent on jurisdiction. Content on the site of a legal nature may or may not be accurate for a particular state or jurisdiction and may largely depend on specific circumstances surrounding individual cases, which may or may not be consistent with your circumstances or may no longer be up-to-date to the extent that laws have changed since posting. Legal articles therefore are for review as general research and for use in helping to gauge a lawyer's expertise on a matter. If you are seeking specific legal advice, Lawyer.com recommends that you contact a lawyer to review your specific issues. See Lawyer.com's full Terms of Use for more information.

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.