Columbus Science, Technology & Internet Lawyer, Ohio, page 2

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


Includes: Biotechnology, Computer Law, Domain Names, Electronic Commerce, Internet

Bryan Mactavish Griffith

Litigation, Patent, Computer Law, Corporate
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  15 Years

Kristen Marie Reese

Computer Law, Federal Appellate Practice, Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  16 Years

Robert Lee Ellis

Trademark, Copyright, Internet, Estate
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  41 Years

Lindsay Karas Stencel

Intellectual Property, Biotechnology, Labor Law, Administrative Law
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  10 Years

Robert Wayne Hamilton

Litigation, Computer Law, Communication & Media Law, Bankruptcy
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Naomi Hazan Maletz

Biotechnology, Health Care Other, Communication & Media Law
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  21 Years

Thomas Stanford Baker

Patent, Intellectual Property, Computer Law, Industry Specialties
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  57 Years

Robert L Ellis

International, Intellectual Property, Internet, Business
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

David Valentine-Elam

Patent, Computer Law, Corporate, Commercial Bankruptcy
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  15 Years

Richard Allen Cline

Administrative Law, Computer Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Columbus Science, Technology & Internet Lawyers and Columbus Science, Technology & Internet Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Industry Specialties areas including Admiralty & Maritime, Advertising, Agriculture, Aviation, Communication & Media Law, Energy, Entertainment, Gaming & Alcohol, Oil & Gas, Transportation & Shipping and Other Industries attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Olive Branch Holdings, LLC v. Smith Technology Dev., LLC

{¶ 2} On April 27, 2004, the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas confirmed an arbitration award in favor of Haney and against Smith Technology in the amount of $1,238,443.11, plus interest, and entered judgment accordingly. See Haney v. Smith Technology Dev., LLC, ...

State v. Ferguson

... After SB 5, any statements, information, photographs, and fingerprints required to be provided by the offender are public records and are included in the Internet database of sex offenders maintained by the Attorney General's office. ...

Hacker v. NATL. COLLEGE OF BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY

{¶ 2} In their sole assignment of error, the appellants contend that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment against them. They claim that the trial court incorrectly applied the summary-judgment standard, making credibility determinations and failing to construe the ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.