Meridian Criminal Lawyer, Oklahoma, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Robert Waddell
About | Practice Areas
R. Todd Waddell Law
6812 N Robinson Ave Oklahoma City, OK 73116» view map
Criminal Defense Law
An Oklahoma Lawyer That Will Fight For You

R. Todd Waddell is a licensed Oklahoma attorney with over 20+ years of experience in several different fields.

405-446-8681
1. Robert Waddell Oklahoma City, OK
  Attorney at Law- OK, 1997
  Oklahoma City University School of Law, J.D.
2. AboutR. Todd Waddell Law
  An Oklahoma Lawyer that will fight for you.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Ryan Coventon

Domestic Violence & Neglect, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

1900 Nw Expressway, Oklahoma City, OK 73118

Jacob L. Rowe

Divorce, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status:

CONTACT

1900 N.W. Expressway, Oklahoma City, OK 73118

Jill S. Anderson

Criminal, Divorce, Family Law, Guardianships & Conservatorships

Status:

CONTACT

4117 Nw 122Nd Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73120

Chris Sloan

Criminal

CONTACT

5100 N Brookline Ave Ste 825, Oklahoma City, OK 73112

Keith Allen Daniels

Real Estate, Criminal, Contract, Divorce

Status:

CONTACT

6621 N Meridian Ave., Oklahoma City, OK 73116

Saul Gilbert Olivarez

Criminal, Divorce, Family Law, Personal Injury

Status:

CONTACT

5929 N. May Ave., Oklahoma City, OK 73112

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Leftwich v. Court of Criminal Appeals

Â¶ 2 The Supreme Court heard oral argument from the Petitioner, Real Party in Interest, and Amicus Curiae. Counsel for Petitioner, counsel for the Real Party in Interest, and counsel for Amicus Curiae all agreed during oral argument that certain issues raised herein were not raised, ...

Ochoa v. Bass

... Respondents. No. HC-2007-1120. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. March 12, 2008. ... hearing. We do not decide whether the trial court can or should ask such questions in any other stage of criminal proceedings prior to sentencing. ...

Nilsen v. State

... No. M-2007-285. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. February 27, 2009. ... 2 Appellant raises the following proposition of error: 1. The stop of Appellant's vehicle was not based on the reasonable suspicion that Appellant was engaged in criminal activity. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Meridian Criminal Lawyer, Oklahoma, page 3

Sponsored Law Firm

R. Todd Waddell Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Ryan Coventon

Jacob L. Rowe

Jill S. Anderson

Chris Sloan

Keith Allen Daniels

Saul Gilbert Olivarez

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

INSANITY

SELF-INCRIMINATION

GRAND JURY

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

ARRAIGNMENT

HOT PURSUIT

PROBABLE CAUSE

MENS REA

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Leftwich v. Court of Criminal Appeals

Ochoa v. Bass

Nilsen v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS