North Hampton Juvenile Law Lawyer, Ohio

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Charles Nelson Ricketts

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Bankruptcy, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  57 Years

Brandin Dawn Marlow

Juvenile Law, Other, Family Law, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  21 Years

John Robert Hammond

Juvenile Law, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  44 Years

Patrick Brian Phillips

Products Liability, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  26 Years

Joseph Charles Graf

Juvenile Law, Estate, Criminal, Elder Law
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  49 Years

Andrew Bantly Stewart

Juvenile Law, Litigation, Corporate, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  26 Years

Nicola Antonio Selvaggio

Juvenile Law, Litigation, Government, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  33 Years

Jay Michael Lopez

Juvenile Law, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Charles Melville Rowland

Litigation, International Other, Juvenile Law, Personal Injury
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Cathy Jo Weithman

Juvenile Law, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Bankruptcy
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  46 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find North Hampton Juvenile Law Lawyers and North Hampton Juvenile Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Criminal areas including DUI-DWI, Expungement, Felony, Misdemeanor, RICO Act, White Collar Crime and Traffic attorneys.

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)
A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)
An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)
The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)
The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)
A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)
A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)
Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)
A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)
A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re AJS

... {¶ 1} This appeal presents two issues for our consideration: First, whether an order of a juvenile court denying ... We hold that the order of a juvenile court denying a motion for mandatory bindover bars the state from prosecuting a juvenile offender as an adult for a criminal offense. ...

State v. DH

... PFEIFER, J. Factual and Procedural Background. {¶ 1} On December 28, 2004, DH, a juvenile, fired a gun into a melee outside his friend Christopher Harris's home. Harris ... Juvenile Courts, the Sixth Amendment, and Due Process. {¶ 40 ...

In re LAB

... LANZINGER, J. {¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to determine whether Juv.R. 29 applies to probation revocation hearings in juvenile courts. We hold that it does. ... He was placed on juvenile probation. LAB appeared before the juvenile court a total of eight times. ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.