Mecosta County, MI Misdemeanor Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Mecosta Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Mecosta lawyers.

Mark J. Warba

Accident & Injury, Car Accident, Wrongful Death, Personal Injury, Slip & Fall Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

115 Ives Ave, Big Rapids, MI 49307

Stacy Lyn Flanery

Estate, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

1630 N. State St., Big Rapids, MI 49307

Robert G. Teeter

Estate, Real Estate, Estate Planning, Wills & Probate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

524 N State St, Big Rapids, MI 49307

Robert G. Teeter

Real Estate, Estate, Estate Planning, Wills & Probate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

524 N State St, Big Rapids, MI 49307

Stephan K. Lobert

Real Estate, Estate Planning, Estate, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

117 South Michigan Ave, Big Rapids, MI 49307

John W. Lewis

Land Use & Zoning, Family Law, Insurance, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

150 S Stewart Ave, Big Rapids, MI 49307

Joseph M. Sweeney

Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

11931 Timberlane Dr, Stanwood, MI 49346

Donald L. Helder

Real Estate, Litigation, Divorce & Family Law, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

150 S Stewart Ave, Big Rapids, MI 49307

Frederic D. Byrne

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

510 Elm St, Big Rapids, MI 49307

Peter M. Jaklevic

Real Estate, Criminal, Business, Consumer Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

400 Elm St, Big Rapids, MI 49307

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Wilder

... And that was that. So, the People have to show that the defendant entered without permission, for the purpose of committing a misdemeanor, taking property, or committing a felony. That his body did go in, so he entered without the owner's permission. ...

People v. Sadows

... and remand for further proceedings. 96 I. In Docket No. 286689, defendant, Colleen Sadows, was charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), MCL 257.625(1), a misdemeanor. Because Sadows was previously ...

People v. Reid

... SAWYER, J. This case presents the question whether the circuit court possesses the jurisdiction 160 to try a defendant on a misdemeanor charge when the accompanying felony charge was dismissed before the beginning of trial. ... Thus, only the misdemeanor charge remained. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Mecosta County, MI Misdemeanor Lawyers

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Mark J. Warba

Stacy Lyn Flanery

Robert G. Teeter

Robert G. Teeter

Stephan K. Lobert

John W. Lewis

Joseph M. Sweeney

Donald L. Helder

Frederic D. Byrne

Peter M. Jaklevic

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CRIMINAL LAW

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

ACTUS REUS

ASSAULT

DIRECTED VERDICT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

BAIL

JURY NULLIFICATION

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Wilder

People v. Sadows

People v. Reid

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 70