Okemos DUI-DWI Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Akiva Goldman
About | Practice Areas
Goldman & Associates
615 Griswold St. Suite 1325 Detroit, MI 48226Â» view map
Criminal
Over 30 Years Experience.

Accessibility, responsiveness, and personal commitment is our approach to client representation.

800-797-8031
1. Akiva Goldman Detroit, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 1986
  Wayne State University J.D. 1986
2. AboutGoldman & Associates
  Our firm has quick and easy access to all courts in the metro Detroit area.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Andrew P. Abood

Divorce, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

246 E Saginaw St, East Lansing, MI 48823

Anita B. Folino

Landlord-Tenant, Lawsuit, Employee Rights, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

4225 Sugar Maple Ln, Okemos, MI 48864

Brendon G. Basiga

Criminal, Lawsuit & Dispute, US Courts, International, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

2211 Association Dr, Okemos, MI 48864

H. James White

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Corporate, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

2549 Jolly Rd, Okemos, MI 48864

Hans H Dittmar

Motor Vehicle, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Family Law, Health Care

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 15 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2395 Jolly Rd, Okemos, MI 48864

Jacob Alan Perrone

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Business, Estate, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

221 West Lake Lansing Road, East Lansing, MI 48823

Jeffrey A. Chip

Family Law, Divorce, DUI-DWI, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

4121 Okemos Rd, Okemos, MI 48864

Kristina Sarah Lyke

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

200 Woodland Pass, East Lansing, MI 48823

Michael Bruce Gawecki

Veterans' Affairs, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

Okemos, MI 48805

Nicholas Leydorf

Domestic Violence & Neglect, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Elder Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

4970 Northwind Drive, East Lansing, MI 48823

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McCarthy v. BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP

... On March 19, 2007, a local business owner, whose son had been prosecuted for a DUI in Brownstown, came to a board [of trustees] meeting to discuss an anonymous letter alleging a township officer received preferential treatment relating to a DUI stop. ...

People v. Ward

... In State v Eaton, [13] the defendant was arrested for driving while under the influence (DUI) and transported to the county jail. ... Defendant was charged with one count of DUI and one count of possession of a controlled substance. ...

People v. Ward

... In State v. Eaton, [13] the defendant was arrested for driving while under the influence (DUI) and transported to the county jail. ... Defendant was charged with one count of DUI and one count of possession of a controlled substance. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Okemos DUI-DWI Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Goldman & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Andrew P. Abood

Anita B. Folino

Brendon G. Basiga

H. James White

Hans H Dittmar

Jacob Alan Perrone

Jeffrey A. Chip

Kristina Sarah Lyke

Michael Bruce Gawecki

Nicholas Leydorf

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

JURY NULLIFICATION

LINEUP

ASSAULT

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CAPITAL CASE

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

IMPRISON

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

McCarthy v. BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP

People v. Ward

People v. Ward

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS