Parrott Criminal Lawyer, Georgia

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jule McReynolds
About | Practice Areas
The McReynolds Law Firm, PC
3799 Main Street #87012 College Park, GA 30337» view map
Criminal Defense
Defending Your Rights

Let The McReynolds Law Firm, PC handle all your criminal defense needs.

800-919-4121
1. Jule McReynolds College Park, GA
  Attorney at Law, GA
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School, J.D.
2. AboutThe McReynolds Law Firm, PC
  Defending Your Rights
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Wilbur Thomas Gamble

Federal Trial Practice, Criminal, Insurance, Business, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 35 Years

CONTACT

177 S Main Street, Dawson, GA 39842

Judge Joe C. Bishop

Constitutional Law, Family Law, Criminal, Military

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

Dawson, GA 39842

Patrick Bennett Calcutt

Real Estate, Health Care Other, Child Custody, Criminal, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

106 W Lamar Street, Americus, GA 31709

Plez Higdon Hardin

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

506 West Lamar Street, Americus, GA 31709

William J Murray

Litigation, Employment, Criminal, Traffic, Workers' Compensation

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

325 S Lee St, Americus, GA 31709

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ruffin v. State

... [3] Thus, the Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights guarantees that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy . . . trial." [4] The Civil War Amendments made the Sixth Amendment speedy trial right enforceable in state criminal prosecutions. ...

Rodriguez v. State

... The indictment charged that both Appellants "did participate in criminal street gang activity by committing a crime of violence, to wit: aggravated assault while associated with a criminal street gang. . . ." A separate count charged ...

English v. State

... Atty., for Appellee. PHIPPS, Judge. Following a jury trial, Jason English was convicted of, among other offenses, criminal attempt to commit aggravated sodomy. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the criminal attempt conviction. We disagree and affirm. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Parrott Criminal Lawyer, Georgia

Sponsored Law Firm

The McReynolds Law Firm, PC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Wilbur Thomas Gamble

Judge Joe C. Bishop

Patrick Bennett Calcutt

Plez Higdon Hardin

William J Murray

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

EAVESDROPPING

INTENTIONAL TORT

BURDEN OF PROOF

CORPUS DELECTI

JURY NULLIFICATION

INFRACTION

JUSTICE SYSTEM

PLEA

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Ruffin v. State

Rodriguez v. State

English v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS