Plainfield Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Mark Guralnick
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick
55 Madison Avenue 4th Floor Morristown, NJ 07960Â» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Dedicated. Fearless. Successful.

Mark S. Guralnick and his legal team have helped clients throughout the USA and across the world by applying unparalleled dedication and hard work to each case.

800-399-8371
1. Mark Guralnick Morristown, NJ
  Attorney at Law - NJ, 1984
  Shepard Broad Law Center J.D.1984
2. AboutLaw Office of Mark S. Guralnick
  Our firm assists clients in a wide variety of legal challenges.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Akiva Goldman

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Estate, Traffic, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Call Now! (877) 737-8800

(866) 666-2889 - CALL NOW! FREE CONSULTATION - Mr. Akiva Goldman is the managing partner of Goldman & Associates and a member of the State Bar of Mich... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-797-8031

625 Kenmoore Avenue SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546

John M. Danian

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Real Estate, Litigation

At Danian Law Office, PLLC, we know how stressful a legal conflict can be. Whether you are facing anything from criminal charges to a civil lawsuit, t... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-795-8280

99 Monroe Ave. NW, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Thomas B. Baynton

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Bankruptcy, Divorce & Family Law, Traffic, DUI-DWI

I fight for you! Let My 29 Years of Experience Work For You!

At the Law Office of Thomas Baynton PLLC, Thomas Baynton is an experienced attorney serving the people of West Michigan. If you have been charged with... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-920-2701

PO Box 230096, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Anthony J. Valentine

Real Estate, Estate Planning, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Waters Building, 161 Ottawa Ave., N.W., Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Jerry M. Beurkens

Medical Malpractice, Traffic, White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

560 Grand Plaza Place, 220 Lyon Street N.W., Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Judith Anne Baxter

Family Law, Wills, Litigation, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

250 Monroe Avenue Ne, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Michael David Adams

Criminal, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Child Custody

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

15 Ionia Ave. Sw, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Aaron D. Wiseley

Litigation, Dispute Resolution, Wills & Probate, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

2090 Celebration Dr Ne, Grand Rapids, MI 49525

Adam Michael Nordquist

Real Estate, Criminal, Contract, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3300 Eagle Run Dr Ne, Grand Rapids, MI 49525

Alex Thomas Grimes

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

82 Ionia Ave Nw, Grand Rapids, MI 49503

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

BAILIFF

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to mai... (more...)

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to maintain order in the courtroom. In addition, bailiffs often help court proceedings go smoothly by shepherding witnesses in and out of the courtroom and handing evidence to witnesses as they testify. In criminal cases, the bailiff may have temporary charge of any defendant who is in custody during court proceedings.

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Plainfield Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Mark S. Guralnick

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Akiva Goldman

John M. Danian

Thomas B. Baynton

Anthony J. Valentine

Jerry M. Beurkens

Judith Anne Baxter

Michael David Adams

Aaron D. Wiseley

Adam Michael Nordquist

Alex Thomas Grimes

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

INFORMED CONSENT

JURY NULLIFICATION

BAILIFF

JUSTICE SYSTEM

HOMICIDE

DIRECTED VERDICT

FEDERAL COURT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

People v. Petri

People v. Horn

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details