Baring Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jason Newcombe
About Us | Services
The Law Offices of Jason S. Newcombe
10700 Meridian Ave N #108 Seattle, WA 98133Â» view map
Criminal Defense, DWI/DUI, Misdemeanor
CONTACT US FOR A CONSULTATION

Our Washington State lawyers have the resources, the knowledge, and the experience to assist you with your legal matter in our practice areas.

800-699-2370
1. Jason Newcombe Seattle, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 1999
  Boston College Law School, J.D. - 1997
2. About UsServing Washington
  Offices in Seattle, Bellevue, Tacoma, Everett, and Olympia
3. ServicesExperienced Attorneys
  We always offer a free initial consultation and case evaluation
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Jason Newcombe

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Bankruptcy & Debt, Accident & Injury, Traffic

From our offices in Seattle and throughout the state of Washington, we help families solve difficult legal problems and move on with their lives. ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-699-2370

10900 NE 8th Street, Bellevue, WA 98004

Lennard A. Nahajski

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Felony, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI

Mr. Nahajski graduated from the University of Washington with a bachelor’s degree in Political Science in 1989, from the University of Oregon School... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-952-8320

10900 NE Fourth Street, Bellevue, WA 98004

Brian Ashbach

✓ VERIFIED

DUI-DWI, Domestic Violence & Neglect

Brian graduated with highest honors (summa cum laude) from Seattle University Law where he was a member of Law Review and winner of multiple awards, a... (more)

CONTACT

800-998-3580

4025 80th Street NE, Marysville, WA 98270

John G. Price

Traffic, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

8201 164th Avenue NE, Redmond, WA 98052

Joyce Heritage

Motor Vehicle, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Credit & Debt

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

Cle ELum, WA 98922

Shannon Alison Llenza

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

28907 Ne 155Th St, Duvall, WA 98019

Shannon Alison Llenza

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

28907 Ne 155Th St, Duvall, WA 98019

Alan Gordon Warner

Litigation, Criminal

Status: Suspended Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

27814 Ne 149Th Ct, Duvall, WA 98019

Sharon E. Williams Abraham

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

Duvall, WA 98019

Virginia H. Harris

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

449 Se Maple Dr, North Bend, WA 98045

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

PROSECUTOR

A lawyer who works for the local, state or federal government to bring and litigate criminal cases.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Baring Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Jason S. Newcombe

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jason Newcombe

Lennard A. Nahajski

Brian Ashbach

John G. Price

Joyce Heritage

Shannon Alison Llenza

Shannon Alison Llenza

Alan Gordon Warner

Sharon E. Williams Abraham

Virginia H. Harris

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BURDEN OF PROOF

JURY NULLIFICATION

DIRECTED VERDICT

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

SPECIFIC INTENT

PROSECUTE

MENS REA

PROSECUTOR

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details