Berlin Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

John F. O'Brien
About | Practice Areas
Attorney John F. O'Brien
411 Center Street Manchester, CT 06040» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Affordable Criminal Defense

Attorney John F. O'Brien is an experienced criminal defense lawyer and trial lawyer. You don’t have to go through this alone, we are here to protect you and your rights!

60-290-9090
1. John F. O'Brien Manchester, CT
  Attorney at Law- CT, 1986
  Western New England University School of Law, J.D. 1986
2. AboutAttorney John F. O'Brien
  Affordable Criminal Defense
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert P. Murphy

Farms, Child Support, DUI-DWI, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1240 Farmington Ave., Berlin, CT 06037

Francis Paola

Criminal, Estate Planning, Family Law, Litigation, Motor Vehicle

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

11 Franklin Square, New Britain, CT 06051

Nicholas E Denigris

Wills & Probate, Criminal, Corporate, Personal Injury

Status: Retired

CONTACT

165 W Main St, New Britain, CT 06050

Thomas S. Luby

Traffic, Corporate, Civil Rights, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

405 Broad St, Meriden, CT 06450

Paul J. Mcquillan

Ethics, Malpractice, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: Deceased

CONTACT

165 West Main Street, New Britain, CT 06050

Anthony W. Pignatiello

Real Estate, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1 Liberty Sq, New Britain, CT 06051

James Michael Marinelli

Wills, Criminal, Products Liability, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 57 Years

CONTACT

55 Lexington St, New Britain, CT 06052

John H Malone

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

20 Franklin Square, New Britain, CT 06051

Gary O Olson

Real Estate, Criminal, Elder Law, Trusts

Status: Inactive Licensed: 68 Years

CONTACT

405 Broad Street, Meriden, CT 06450

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

... to 2003) Â§ 54-251 and General Statutes Â§ 54-257. After a hearing, the trial court found that, because the defendant had failed to register as a sex offender, he had violated the condition of his probation that required him to not violate any criminal law. ...

State v. DeJesus

... we will maintain the liberal standard, but do so as a limited exception to the prohibition on the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence in sexual assault cases to prove that the defendant had a propensity to engage in aberrant and compulsive criminal sexual behavior. ...

State v. Salamon

... In accordance with these principles, we have not hesitated to revisit and overrule our prior holdings, including prior holdings applicable to criminal matters; see, eg, State v. Skakel, supra, at 693, 888 A.2d 985; State v. Miranda, supra, at 733-34, 878 A.2d 1118; State v. Colon ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Berlin Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

Attorney John F. O'Brien

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert P. Murphy

Francis Paola

Nicholas E Denigris

Thomas S. Luby

Paul J. Mcquillan

Anthony W. Pignatiello

James Michael Marinelli

John H Malone

Gary O Olson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACQUITTAL

INTERROGATION

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

PROBABLE CAUSE

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

LINEUP

HUNG JURY

EAVESDROPPING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

State v. DeJesus

State v. Salamon

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details