Byers Misdemeanor Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Stephanie Alvarado
About | Practice Areas
Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
100 N Central Expy Suite 805 Richardson, TX 75080» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Fighting Against Unjust Prosecution

Attorney Stephanie Alvarado is there for her clients when help is needed right away. Helping people charged with crimes in Texas for over 20 years.

800-988-5471
1. Stephanie Alvarado Richardson, TX
  Attorney at Law - TX, 1996
  Baylor University J.D. 1996
2. AboutStephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law
  Over 20 Years of Experience
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Byers Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Byers Criminal lawyers.

John William Swenson

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

7585 Fm 810, Petrolia, TX 76377

Katie Ann Woods

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

113 W Gilbert St, Henrietta, TX 76365

Dustin Eugene Nimz

Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Criminal, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

900 8Th St, Wichita Falls, TX 76301

Benjamin Edwin Hoover

Mass Torts, Domestic Violence & Neglect, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

711 Indiana Ave, Wichita Falls, TX 76301

Matthew Alan Fass

Juvenile Law, Other, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

710 Lamar St, Wichita Falls, TX 76301

Carey Colin Jensen

State Appellate Practice, Wills, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

Wichita Falls, TX 76307

Jeffrey Lewis Eaves

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

900 8Th St, Wichita Falls, TX 76301

Ricky L. Mahler

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

Wichita Falls, TX 76307

Thomas C. Cotton

Juvenile Law, Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Domestic Violence & Neglect

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

900 8Th St, Wichita Falls, TX 76301

Stacy Lori Kosub

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Criminal, Civil Rights, Education

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

900 8Th St, Wichita Falls, TX 76301

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Kirkpatrick v. State

... presented its case-in-chief, appellant moved for an instructed verdict on the felony forgery count, asserting that the state had failed to prove felony forgery because it had not alleged or proven any of the elements necessary to make the forgery a felony rather than a misdemeanor ...

Edison v. State

... no authority to defer adjudication and extend his community supervision for two years; the court had no authority to revoke his community supervision because it had expired as a matter of law; he was denied due process because he was convicted of a misdemeanor offense but ...

Ex parte Harrington

... We hold that it is. In this case, applicant contends that habeas corpus lies because his plea was involuntary due to counsel's ineffectiveness in failing to investigate a prior DWI conviction used to enhance applicant's misdemeanor DWI charge to a felony charge. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Byers Misdemeanor Lawyer, Texas

Sponsored Law Firm

Stephanie Alvarado Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

John William Swenson

Katie Ann Woods

Dustin Eugene Nimz

Benjamin Edwin Hoover

Matthew Alan Fass

Carey Colin Jensen

Jeffrey Lewis Eaves

Ricky L. Mahler

Thomas C. Cotton

Stacy Lori Kosub

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

CRIMINAL INSANITY

MOTION IN LIMINE

NOLO CONTENDERE

HABEAS CORPUS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

PROSECUTE

LINEUP

BURDEN OF PROOF

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Kirkpatrick v. State

Edison v. State

Ex parte Harrington

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details