Charlotte RICO Act Lawyer, North Carolina

Sponsored Law Firm


Samuel J. Randall Lawyer

Samuel J. Randall

VERIFIED
Criminal, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony, White Collar Crime

Since 1998, Samuel J. Randall, IV has built a solid reputation among his peers, adversaries, and the judiciary in North Carolina as an aggressive and ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-692-9351

Andrew  Gordon Lawyer

Andrew Gordon

VERIFIED
Criminal, Accident & Injury, Personal Injury, Landlord-Tenant, Traffic

Andrew was born and raised in Syracuse, NY and moved to Charlotte in 2010 to pursue his legal education. Having grown up with 8 siblings and step-sibl... (more)

Carlos R. Emory Lawyer

Carlos R. Emory

VERIFIED
Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Consumer Rights, Immigration

C. Randy Emory was born and raised in the small, rural town of Wilson NC. Throughout his childhood, Mr. Emory displayed many leadership qualities. In ... (more)

Kirk Robert Lundell Lawyer

Kirk Robert Lundell

VERIFIED
Divorce & Family Law, Child Custody, Employment, Criminal, DUI-DWI

Following a successful 15-year career managing several well-known retail stores throughout the country, Mr. Lundell decided to refocus his passion for... (more)

Richard L. Brown Lawyer

Richard L. Brown

VERIFIED
Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt, Personal Injury, Accident & Injury

Mr. Brown has practiced law primarily in Union County, North Carolina for over 14 years. He also serves the surrounding counties of Anson and Mecklenb... (more)

Thomas H. Ainsworth

Bad Faith, Criminal, Dental Malpractice, Animal Bite
Status:  In Good Standing           

Sheena West Gatehouse

Administrative Law, Bed Bug, Criminal, DUI-DWI
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Deke Falls

Tax, Litigation, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           

Peter E. McArdle

Alimony & Spousal Support, Child Support, Criminal, Defamation & Slander
Status:  In Good Standing           

Chris McCartan

Administrative Law, Criminal, DUI-DWI, Traffic
Status:  In Good Standing           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Charlotte RICO Act Lawyers and Charlotte RICO Act Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Criminal areas including DUI-DWI, Expungement, Felony, Misdemeanor, White Collar Crime, Traffic and Juvenile Law attorneys.

LEGAL TERMS

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)
The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)
A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)
A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)
The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)
An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)
A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.