Cooks Felony Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Akiva Goldman
About | Practice Areas
Goldman & Associates
615 Griswold St. Suite 1325 Detroit, MI 48226» view map
Probate
Over 30 Years Experience

Accessibility, responsiveness, and personal commitment is our approach to client representation.

800-797-8031
1. Akiva Goldman Detroit, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 1986
  Wayne State University J.D. 1986
2. AboutGoldman & Associates
  Our firm has quick and easy access to all courts in the metro Detroit area.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Probate
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Cooks Felony lawyer.
Below are all Cooks Criminal lawyers.

William W. Carmody

Real Estate, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Environmental Law

Status: Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

Munising, MI 49862

John R. Filoramo

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Traffic

Status: Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

504 Ludington St, Escanaba, MI 49829

Trenton Matthew Stupak

Lawsuit & Dispute, Defect and Lemon Law, Immigration, Pension & Benefits, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

205 Ludington Street, Escanaba, MI 49829

John B. Economopoulos

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

310 Ludington St, Escanaba, MI 49829

Ralph B. Blasier

Power of Attorney, Dispute Resolution, Child Custody, Criminal, Medical Malpractice

Status: Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

700 Lake Shore Dr, Escanaba, MI 49829

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

MISDEMEANOR

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk d... (more...)

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk driving and leaving the scene of an accident are all common misdemeanors.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Ream

... Opinion. MARKMAN, J. At issue here is whether convicting and sentencing a defendant for both first-degree felony murder and the predicate felony 538 violates the "multiple punishments" strand of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States and Michigan constitutions. ...

People v. Gardner

... This Court has ruled that the statutes imply that each predicate felony must arise from separate criminal incidents. ... Therefore, multiple felonies that arise from the same criminal incident or transaction count as a single felony under the habitual offender laws. ...

People v. Idziak

... In this case, we consider whether a parolee who is convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment for a felony committed while on parole is entitled, under Michigan's jail credit statute, MCL 769.11b, to credit for time served in jail after his arrest on the new offense and ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Cooks Felony Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Goldman & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

William W. Carmody

John R. Filoramo

Trenton Matthew Stupak

John B. Economopoulos

Ralph B. Blasier

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

INFRACTION

MISDEMEANOR

JURY NULLIFICATION

MENS REA

ACTUS REUS

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

INSANITY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Ream

People v. Gardner

People v. Idziak

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS