Dimondale Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Nickolas Hannawa
About | Practice Areas
Hannawa Law PC
2909 E Big Beaver Rd Troy, MI 48083» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Full-service legal experts on your side.

Whatever the specific details of your situation may be, our attorneys are ready to fight for you and guide you through every step of the process.

248-466-0770
1. Nickolas Hannawa Troy, MI
  Attorney at Law, MI
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School, J.D. 2013
2. AboutHannawa Law PC
  Full-service legal experts on your side.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Bobby Alonza Ficklin

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Social Security, Divorce

Bobby Ficklin is a practicing lawyer in the state of Michigan.

CONTACT

517-798-6345

2722 E Michigan Ave, Lansing, MI 48912

Richard L. Williams

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Traffic

Attorney Richard L. Williams provides legal services for driver’s license restoration, expungement of criminal records, domestic assault, civil infr... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-945-0701

411 W Lake Lansing Rd, East Lansing, MI 48823

Steven A. Freeman

Felony, Felony, Felony, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

6510 Cheshire Drive, Dimondale, MI 48821

Joshua Mark Pease

Guardianships & Conservatorships, Criminal, Children's Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

420 S Waverly Rd, Lansing, MI 48917

Michael J. Cronkright

Immigration, Divorce & Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal, Children's Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

420 S Waverly Rd, Lansing, MI 48917

Kareem LaMount Johnson

Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 16 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

120 North Washington Square, Lansing, MI 48933

Patrick W. O'Keefe

Deportation, Criminal, Administrative Law, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

7804 Francis Ct, Lansing, MI 48917

John M. English

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

420 S Waverly Rd, Lansing, MI 48917

John W. Ujlaky

Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

3721 W Michigan Ave, Lansing, MI 48917

Sherrie P. Guess

Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Collection

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

5208 W Saginaw Hwy, Lansing, MI 48908

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

JUSTICE SYSTEM

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal... (more...)

A term lawyers use to describe the courts and other bureaucracies that handle American's criminal legal business, including offices of various state and federal prosecutors and public defenders. Many people caught up in this system refer to it by less flattering names.

CRIMINAL CASE

A lawsuit brought by a prosecutor employed by the federal, state or local government that charges a person with the commission of a crime.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Dimondale Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Hannawa Law PC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Bobby Alonza Ficklin

Richard L. Williams

Steven A. Freeman

Joshua Mark Pease

Michael J. Cronkright

Kareem LaMount Johnson

Patrick W. O'Keefe

John M. English

John W. Ujlaky

Sherrie P. Guess

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-DEFENSE

BURDEN OF PROOF

JURY NULLIFICATION

DIRECTED VERDICT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

NOLLE PROSEQUI

JUSTICE SYSTEM

CRIMINAL CASE

IMPEACH

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

People v. Petri

People v. Horn

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details