Dixie RICO Act Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Cooper
About | Services
The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.
848 Brickell Avenue Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131Â» view map
DWI/DUI, Drug Trafficking, Felony
Nationally Ranked Top 40 Under 40

With Richard L. Cooper you can expect a trusted confidant who will work diligently to fully understand your case and determine a road map to help you regain control of your life.

800-756-2781
1. Richard L. Cooper Miami, FL
  Attorney at Law - FL, 2011
  Nova Southeastern University, J.D.
2. AboutMiami Attorney at Law
  Covering all Felonies and Misdemeanors including drugs, theft, DUI, probation violations, and much more.
3. ServicesCriminal Defense
  We know that being faced with a serious criminal charge is frightening.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Video
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Dixie RICO Act lawyer.
Below are all Dixie Criminal lawyers.

Paul Jacob Boudreaux

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Introducing Paul Boudreaux: Your Advocate for Criminal Defense and Personal Injury Matters in Washington State In the realm of justice, where the s... (more)

CONTACT

509-404-9239

38 E Main St, Walla Walla, WA 99362

Rea Lynn Culwell

Federal, State Government, Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

625 S College Ave, College Place, WA 99324

Cathlin Donohue

Land Use & Zoning, Family Law, Federal, Criminal

Status: Deceased Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

506 E Richmond Ave, Dayton, WA 99328

C Dale Slack

State Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

215 E Clay St, Dayton, WA 99328

Charles Hubbard Thronson

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

531 N Touchet Rd, Dayton, WA 99328

Randell O'Neil Lewis

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

709 S Touchet Rd, Dayton, WA 99328

Emily Marie Gause

Federal Appellate Practice, Juvenile Law, Criminal, Merger & Acquisition

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

631 Strander Blvd, Seattle, WA 98188

David Mark Rose

Employment Discrimination, Criminal, Civil Rights, Personal Injury, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

216 S Palouse St, Walla Walla, WA 99362

Rachel Lynn Cortez

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

6 E Alder St, Walla Walla, WA 99362

June Leeper Riley

State Government, Criminal, Federal Appellate Practice, Municipal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

15 N 3Rd Ave, Walla Walla, WA 99362

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

MISDEMEANOR

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk d... (more...)

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk driving and leaving the scene of an accident are all common misdemeanors.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Dixie RICO Act Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Richard L. Cooper, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Paul Jacob Boudreaux

Rea Lynn Culwell

Cathlin Donohue

C Dale Slack

Charles Hubbard Thronson

Randell O'Neil Lewis

Emily Marie Gause

David Mark Rose

Rachel Lynn Cortez

June Leeper Riley

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY NULLIFICATION

SPECIFIC INTENT

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

ACTUS REUS

IMPEACH

MISDEMEANOR

JURY

SELF-DEFENSE

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details