East Hampton Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Andrew Amendola
About | Practice Areas
Andrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law
591 Thompson Avenue East Haven, CT 06512» view map
Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Real Estate
Where Every Client Matters

Let Andrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law handle all your legal needs today@

800-942-4780
1. Andrew Amendola East Haven, CT
  Attorney at Law, CT
2. AboutAndrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law
  Where Every Client Matters
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Real Estate
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Robert Michael Elliott

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Wills & Probate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Real Estate

Member CT Bar Association Since 1971

Here at the Law Office of Robert M. Elliott in Colchester CT we are dedicated to serving the individual needs of our Clients. Our law practice offers... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

860-603-2094

108 Norwich Avenue, Colchester, CT 06415

Maxwell Quinn Bartels

Workers' Compensation, Employment Discrimination, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

60 Tarragon Dr, East Hampton, CT 06424

Scott W Jezek

Pension & Benefits, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

31 Wf Palmer Road, Moodus, CT 06469

Peter W Soulsby

Criminal, Business, Car Accident, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

11 South Main Street, Marlborough, CT 06447

John Brian Swanson

Traffic, Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Landlord-Tenant

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

21 Paper Mill Rd, Marlborough, CT 06447

J Christopher Llinas

Juvenile Law, Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 7 Years

CONTACT

553 Portland-Cobalt Road, Portland, CT 06480

Michael Epright

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

Haddam, CT 06438

Jeremiah Ollennu

Pharmaceutical Product, Divorce, Felony, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

262 Marlborough St, Portland, CT 06480

Ronald Wilhelm Kutz

Real Estate, Criminal, Business, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

262 Marlborough Street, Portland, CT 06480

Joseph Edwin Prokop

Real Estate, Criminal, Business, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

262 Marlborough St, Portland, CT 06480

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

BAIL BOND

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear... (more...)

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear for a court hearing, the judge can issue a warrant for his arrest and threaten to 'forfeit,' or keep, the money if the defendant doesn't appear soon. Usually, the bondsman will look for the defendant and bring him back, forcefully if necessary, in order to avoid losing the bail money.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

... to 2003) Â§ 54-251 and General Statutes Â§ 54-257. After a hearing, the trial court found that, because the defendant had failed to register as a sex offender, he had violated the condition of his probation that required him to not violate any criminal law. ...

State v. DeJesus

... we will maintain the liberal standard, but do so as a limited exception to the prohibition on the admission of uncharged misconduct evidence in sexual assault cases to prove that the defendant had a propensity to engage in aberrant and compulsive criminal sexual behavior. ...

State v. Salamon

... In accordance with these principles, we have not hesitated to revisit and overrule our prior holdings, including prior holdings applicable to criminal matters; see, eg, State v. Skakel, supra, at 693, 888 A.2d 985; State v. Miranda, supra, at 733-34, 878 A.2d 1118; State v. Colon ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

East Hampton Criminal Lawyer, Connecticut

Sponsored Law Firm

Andrew M Amendola, Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Robert Michael Elliott

Maxwell Quinn Bartels

Scott W Jezek

Peter W Soulsby

John Brian Swanson

J Christopher Llinas

Michael Epright

Jeremiah Ollennu

Ronald Wilhelm Kutz

Joseph Edwin Prokop

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

FEDERAL COURT

MENS REA

NOLO CONTENDERE

BAIL BOND

CORPUS DELECTI

CAPITAL CASE

DIRECTED VERDICT

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

SELF-DEFENSE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. TD

State v. DeJesus

State v. Salamon

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details