Estacada Criminal Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Gregory Oliveros
About | Practice Areas
Oliveros Law Group, P.C.
9200 S.E. Sunnybrook Boulevard Suite 335 Clackamas, OR 97015» view map
Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
007 Law

At Oliveros Law Group P.C, our attorneys help clients understand their rights when they have been injured due to the deliberate or careless act of another person.

800-797-7891
1. Gregory Oliveros Clackamas, OR
  Attorney at Law - OR, 1990
  Lewis & Clark Law School J.D. 1990
2. AboutOliveros Law Group, P.C.
  007 Law
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense, Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Gregory P. Oliveros

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Gregory Paul Oliveros was born and raised in the Portland area. After graduating from the Oregon College of Education in 1973, he taught in the Portla... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-797-7891

9200 S.E. Sunnybrook Boulevard, Clackamas, OR 97015

Mark R. Bailey

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

294 Warner Milne Road, Oregon City, OR 97045

Daniel Woram

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

615 Main St, Oregon City, OR 97045

John Henry Hingson

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Oregon City, OR 97045

Daniel Patrick Woram

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

615 Main St, Oregon City, OR 97045

Kathleen Michelle Baker

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

294 Warner Milne Road, Oregon City, OR 97045

Benjamin Bumsuk Kim

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

294 Warner Milne Rd, Oregon City, OR 97045

John H Hingson

White Collar Crime, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Oregon City, OR 97045

Jared Justice

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Oregon City, OR 97045

Wm Bruce Shepley

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

615 Main St, Oregon City, OR 97045

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

PROSECUTOR

A lawyer who works for the local, state or federal government to bring and litigate criminal cases.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Rodriguez/Buck

... [9]. 3. Criminal History and Recidivism. A third factor that this court often has considered in proportionality cases is the defendant's criminal history. ... It is another indication that Measure 11 sentences in these cases would be disproportionate to the offense. 3. Criminal History. ...

State v. Rodgers

... stop was unlawfully extended when Van Arsdall had everything he needed to issue a citation for the burned-out license plate light and, instead of doing so, questioned defendant about the containers without reasonable suspicion that defendant had engaged in criminal activity. ...

State v. Lennon

... Based on the seriousness of his current offense and the existence of two person-related felony convictions in his criminal history, the presumptive sentence for defendant's offense under the sentencing guidelines was 35 to 40 months of incarceration. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Estacada Criminal Lawyer, Oregon

Sponsored Law Firm

Oliveros Law Group, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Gregory P. Oliveros

Mark R. Bailey

Daniel Woram

John Henry Hingson

Daniel Patrick Woram

Kathleen Michelle Baker

Benjamin Bumsuk Kim

John H Hingson

Jared Justice

Wm Bruce Shepley

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACQUITTAL

PROSECUTOR

MENS REA

INFORMED CONSENT

HABEAS CORPUS

CIVIL

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

EAVESDROPPING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Rodriguez/Buck

State v. Rodgers

State v. Lennon

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details