Footville Criminal Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

David Saperstein
About | Practice Areas
Hurley Burish, S.C.
33 East Main Street Suite 400 Madison, WI 53703» view map
Estate and Criminal Defense Law
A Law Firm You Can Trust

Dedicated to providing clients with the comprehensive, creative, and thorough work.

608-257-0945
1. David Saperstein Madison, WI
  Attorney at Law- WI
  DePaul University College of Law, J.D. 1995
2. AboutHurley Burish, S.C.
  A Law Firm You Can Trust
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Brad Carroll Schweiger

Mediation, DUI-DWI, Divorce, Estate Planning

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2031 Riverside Drive, Beloit, WI 53511

Scott K McCarthy

Lawsuit & Dispute, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

205 S John Paul Road, Milton, WI 53563

Madaleine R. Mulrey

Criminal, Lawsuit & Dispute, Traffic, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

5 W Rollin St, Edgerton, WI 53534

Madaleine Fryda

DUI-DWI, Juvenile Law, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

5 West Rollin St., Edgerton, WI 53534

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

ARREST

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arre... (more...)

A situation in which the police detain a person in a manner that, to any reasonable person, makes it clear she is not free to leave. A person can be 'under arrest' even though the police have not announced it; nor are handcuffs or physical restraint necessary. Questioning an arrested person about her involvement in or knowledge of a crime must be preceded by the Miranda warnings if the police intend to use the answers against the person in a criminal case. If the arrested person chooses to remain silent, the questioning must stop.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

PROSECUTOR

A lawyer who works for the local, state or federal government to bring and litigate criminal cases.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kramer

... Id. Â¶ 11 A primary question the court of appeals addressed was whether evidence of Wagner's subjective belief that criminal activity might be taking place operated to preclude his conduct from coming within the scope of his community caretaker function. Id., Â¶ 13. ...

State v. Harris

... I. Did the State violate Wis. Stat. Â§ 971.23(1) (the criminal discovery statute) or the ... Stat. Â§ 971.23(1) (the criminal discovery statute) by failing to disclose timely the defendant's request to put on a particular pair of pants? If so, was the defendant prejudiced by the violation? III. ...

State v. Schaefer

... 2 After permitting Schaefer's interlocutory appeal, the court of appeals certified the following question to this court: "Does a criminal defendant have a subpoena right to obtain and copy police investigation reports and nonprivileged materials prior to the preliminary hearing ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Footville Criminal Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

Hurley Burish, S.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Brad Carroll Schweiger

Scott K McCarthy

Madaleine R. Mulrey

Madaleine Fryda

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INSANITY

ARREST

GRAND JURY

HOT PURSUIT

IMPEACH

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

PROSECUTOR

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

CONTINGENCY FEE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kramer

State v. Harris

State v. Schaefer

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details