Genesee Felony Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Williams
About | Practice Areas
The Williams Law Firm
411 W Lake Lansing Rd Ste C-110 East Lansing, MI 48823» view map
Criminal Defense Law
A Defense Lawyer With Proven Results

Knowing the law certainly is a necessary prerequisite but an attorney’s ability to effectively communicate is perhaps his or her paramount importance.

800-945-0701
1. Richard L. Williams East Lansing, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 1978
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School J.D.
2. AboutThe Williams Law Firm
  We stop at nothing to get what we want.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Jessica M Lashier

Traffic, Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

167 South Main Street, Romeo, MI 48065

Joshua Duane Jones

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

3906 Baldwin Rd. #210017, Auburn Hills, MI 48321

Robert L. Levi

Employee Rights, Felony, Discrimination, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

4125 Cumberland Ct, Commerce Township, MI 48390

Christopher S. Johnson

Grand Jury Proceedings, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

101 E Grand River Ave, Fowlerville, MI 48836

David Rudoi

DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

7 West Square Lake Rd., Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302

Kathleen Wilson Fink

DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime, RICO Act, Felony, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

280 North Old Woodward, Birmingham, MI 48009

Scott Christopher Kozak

Traffic, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Felony, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

44648 Mound Rd, Sterling Heights, MI 48314

Andrew Hubbs

Felony, Misdemeanor, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

44444 Mound Road, Sterling Heights, MI 48314

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

INFORMATION

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or ... (more...)

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or a misdemeanor. The information tells the defendant what crime he is charged with, against whom and when the offense allegedly occurred, but the prosecutor is not obliged to go into great detail. If the defendant wants more specifics, he must ask for it by way of a discovery request. Compare indictment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Ream

... Opinion. MARKMAN, J. At issue here is whether convicting and sentencing a defendant for both first-degree felony murder and the predicate felony 538 violates the "multiple punishments" strand of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States and Michigan constitutions. ...

People v. Gardner

... This Court has ruled that the statutes imply that each predicate felony must arise from separate criminal incidents. ... Therefore, multiple felonies that arise from the same criminal incident or transaction count as a single felony under the habitual offender laws. ...

People v. Idziak

... In this case, we consider whether a parolee who is convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment for a felony committed while on parole is entitled, under Michigan's jail credit statute, MCL 769.11b, to credit for time served in jail after his arrest on the new offense and ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Genesee Felony Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

The Williams Law Firm

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jessica M Lashier

Joshua Duane Jones

Robert L. Levi

Christopher S. Johnson

David Rudoi

Kathleen Wilson Fink

Scott Christopher Kozak

Andrew Hubbs

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EAVESDROPPING

PLEA BARGAIN

FEDERAL COURT

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

INDECENT EXPOSURE

INFRACTION

DIRECTED VERDICT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

INFORMATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Ream

People v. Gardner

People v. Idziak

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details