Gilson Criminal Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Scott Kamin
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices of Scott T. Kamin
53 W. Jackson Blvd Suite 1057 Chicago, IL 60604» view map
Criminal Defense & Felony
If The Police Were Wrong, CALL SCOTT

My goal as your criminal defense lawyer is to help you minimize the consequences you face. I have extensive outside resources and an experienced staff on my side.

800-963-2980
1. Scott Kamin Chicago, IL
  Attorney at Law - IL, 1995
  Drake University J.D. 1994
2. AboutLaw Offices of Scott T. Kamin
  If The Police Were Wrong, CALL SCOTT
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense & Felony
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Anthony Vaupel

Divorce & Family Law, Bankruptcy, Estate Planning, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Galesburg, IL 61401

Ashley M. Worby

Landlord-Tenant, Dispute Resolution, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

117 E. Main Street, Galesburg, IL 61401

Carol Simpson

Criminal, Civil Rights, Litigation, Estate Planning

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

250 E Main St, Galesburg, IL 61401

Sterling Simpson

Traffic, Litigation, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 49 Years

CONTACT

250 E Main St, Galesburg, IL 61401

Roger Leroy Williamson

Real Estate, Criminal, Personal Injury, Workers' Compensation

Status: Inactive Licensed: 60 Years

CONTACT

250 E Main St, Galesburg, IL 61401

Kimberly A. Norton

Criminal, Family Law, Traffic, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

161 S. Cherry St, Galesburg, IL 61401

Kimberly Norton

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

161 S. Cherry St, Galesburg, IL 61401

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

MISDEMEANOR

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk d... (more...)

A crime, less serious than a felony, punishable by no more than one year in jail. Petty theft (of articles worth less than a certain amount), first-time drunk driving and leaving the scene of an accident are all common misdemeanors.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Leonard

... Defendant Finis Leonard was convicted by a jury of the offenses of habitual armed criminal and unlawful possession of a weapon by a felon and sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 30 years and 10 years, respectively. He appealed. We affirm. FACTS. ...

People v. Jackson

... were, therefore, admissible. Defendant also filed a motion in limine to preclude any evidence of his 1998 conviction for criminal sexual assault, which had required him to submit a DNA sample to be placed in a database. At the ...

People v. Pelo

... Interveners-appellants, The Pantagraph newspaper and its reporter Edith Brady Lunny (Pantagraph), filed a petition to intervene and gain access to an evidence deposition in a criminal case, People v. Pelo (Nos. ... The underlying criminal case, People v. Pelo (Nos. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Gilson Criminal Lawyer, Illinois

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Scott T. Kamin

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Anthony Vaupel

Ashley M. Worby

Carol Simpson

Sterling Simpson

Roger Leroy Williamson

Kimberly A. Norton

Kimberly Norton

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

JURY

MISDEMEANOR

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

DIRECTED VERDICT

SPECIFIC INTENT

JURY NULLIFICATION

CONVICTION

ARRAIGNMENT

BURDEN OF PROOF

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Leonard

People v. Jackson

People v. Pelo

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details