Glenoma DUI-DWI Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

James Hill
About | Practice Areas
Russell & Hill, PLLC
1212 North Washington St. Suite 132 Spokane, WA 99201» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Professional, Personal, Proven

You have questions, and we have answers. Here at Russell & Hill, PLLC, we know how to obtain the most favorable outcome for your particular circumstances.

800-928-5340
1. James Hill Spokane, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 2001
  Seattle University J.D. 2001
2. AboutRussell & Hill, PLLC
  Professional, Personal, Proven
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Glenoma DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Glenoma Criminal lawyers.

Breckan Scott

Lawsuit & Dispute, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

Yelm, WA 98597

Christine D. Langley

Estate Planning, Estate, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

Rainier, WA 98576

W. Keith Goody

Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights, Venture Capital

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Cougar, WA 98616

Richard G. Welch

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 55 Years

CONTACT

Enumclaw, WA 98022

Gregory Todd Isham

Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

Tacoma, WA 98433

Ronald Anthony Gomes

International Tax, Bankruptcy, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Suspended Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

3093 Carpenter Hills Loop Se, Lacey, WA 98503

Patricia A. Talbott

Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

Lacey, WA 98509

Abigail Laura Miguel

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

7078 Flute St Se, Lacey, WA 98513

Joseph Michael Svoboda

State Government, Municipal, Government, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

4438 Pacific Ave Se, Lacey, WA 98503

David S Schneider

Municipal, Estate Planning, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

4438 Pacific Ave Se, Lacey, WA 98503

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Chambers

... Deborah A. Dwyer, King Co. Pros. Ofc./Appellate Unit, Seattle, WA, for Respondent. SCHINDLER, J. Â¶ 1 Under former RCW 46.61.502(6)(2007), the crime of driving while under the influence (DUI) is elevated from a gross ... We affirm the jury's conviction of felony DUI. FACTS. ...

State v. Eaton

... Michael C. Kinnie, Attorney at Law, Vancouver, WA, for Respondent. BRIDGEWATER, PJ. Â¶ 1 A jury convicted Thomas Eaton of one count of driving while under the influence (DUI) and one count of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, namely methamphetamine. ...

State v. Eaton

... CHAMBERS, J. Â¶ 1 Thomas Eaton was arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) and taken by police to the Clark County Jail. ... After performing field sobriety tests Officer Starks concluded that Eaton was impaired and arrested him for DUI. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Glenoma DUI-DWI Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

Russell & Hill, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Breckan Scott

Christine D. Langley

W. Keith Goody

Richard G. Welch

Gregory Todd Isham

Ronald Anthony Gomes

Patricia A. Talbott

Abigail Laura Miguel

Joseph Michael Svoboda

David S Schneider

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

PLEA

JURY NULLIFICATION

DIRECTED VERDICT

MENS REA

ASSAULT

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

CRIMINAL LAW

IMPRISON

SELF-DEFENSE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Chambers

State v. Eaton

State v. Eaton

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details