Grand Rapids Misdemeanor Lawyer, Minnesota
Not enough matches for Grand Rapids Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Grand Rapids Criminal lawyers.
SPONSORED LAWYERS
1-2 of 2 matches. Page 1 of 1
20 NE 4th St, Grand Rapids, MN 55744
Profile LAWPOINTS™30/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
Robert Edward Dolan
Litigation, Criminal, Animal Bite, Accident & Injury, Car Accident
Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years
201 NW 4th Street, Ste 10, Grand Rapids, MN 55744
Profile LAWPOINTS™22/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
TIPS
Easily find Grand Rapids Misdemeanor Lawyers and Grand Rapids Misdemeanor Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Criminal areas including DUI-DWI, Expungement, Felony, RICO Act, White Collar Crime, Traffic and Juvenile Law attorneys.
LEGAL TERMS
INSANITY
See criminal insanity.
PLEA
The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)
The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).
BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT
The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)
The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.
SPECIFIC INTENT
An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)
An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.
FEDERAL COURT
A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)
A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.
JURY NULLIFICATION
A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)
A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.
INTERROGATION
A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)
A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.
CORPUS DELECTI
Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.
NOLLE PROSEQUI
Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)
Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'
SAMPLE LEGAL CASES
Morris v. State
... OPINION. ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice. Appellant Jeffrey C. Morris pleaded guilty pro se
to two counts of misdemeanor theft and received a sentence that required him to serve 45 days
in the Hennepin County workhouse. Morris did not pursue a direct appeal. ...
State v. Johnson
... FACTS. In September 2008, appellant Randolph Johnson, Jr. was charged with felony domestic
assault by strangulation, a violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.2247, subd. 2 (2008), and misdemeanor
fifth-degree assault, a violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.224, subd. 1(2) (2008). ...
State v. Meyer
... OPINION. WRIGHT, Judge. In this appeal from a conviction of gross-misdemeanor
domestic assault, appellant argues that the district court committed reversible error
by (1) admitting evidence of prior domestic abuse under Minn.Stat. ...
FILTER BY:
- Free Consultation
- Male
- Female
- Suspended
PRACTICE AREAS 30
- Accident & Injury
- Bankruptcy & Debt
- Business
- Civil & Human Rights
- Consumer Rights
- Criminal
- -DUI-DWI
- -Expungement
- -Felony
- Misdemeanor
- -RICO Act
- -White Collar Crime
- -Traffic
- -Juvenile Law
- Divorce & Family Law
- Employment
- Environmental Law
- Estate
- Government
- Health Care
- Immigration
- Industry Specialties
- Intellectual Property
- International
- Lawsuit & Dispute
- Mass Torts
- Motor Vehicle
- Real Estate
- Tax
- Other