Gray Mountain Juvenile Law Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Zachary Mushkatel
About | Practice Areas
Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
15249 N. 99th Ave Sun City, AZ 85351» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Get Solutions To Your Legal Problems

At Mushkatel, Robbins & Becker, PLLC, our goal is to provide you with a comfortable environment where you can get trusted guidance on the legal matters affecting your life.

800-895-6240
1. Zachary Mushkatel Sun City, AZ
  Attorney at Law - AZ, 2004
  University of Minnesota J.D. 2004
2. AboutMushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
  Dedicated to Justice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Chad Joshua Winger

Litigation, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Juvenile Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Jacqueline A Kozlik

Juvenile Law, Family Law, Collaborative Law, Divorce, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

., Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Brent Davidson Harris

Juvenile Law, Wills & Probate, Trusts, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Brent Davidson Harris

Juvenile Law, Trusts, Estate, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Bruce W Griffin

Juvenile Law, Other

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

3422 N King St, Flagstaff, AZ 86004

Bruce W Griffin

Juvenile Law, Other

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

3422 N King St, Flagstaff, AZ 86004

Benjamin L Deguire

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

223 N San Francisco St, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Benjamin L Deguire

Mediation, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

223 N San Francisco St, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Gary Pearlmutter

Other, Public Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 32 Years

CONTACT

Flagstaff, AZ 86002

Jacqueline P Fisk-Glazer

Trusts, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

114 N San Francisco St, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

ARRAIGNMENT

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters... (more...)

A court appearance in which the defendant is formally charged with a crime and asked to respond by pleading guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. Other matters often handled at the arraignment are arranging for the appointment of a lawyer to represent the defendant and the setting of bail.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

DENISE R. v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC.

... OPINION. ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge. Â¶ 1 After Denise R. failed to appear for a December 2008 initial termination hearing, the juvenile court terminated her parental rights to her eleven-year-old son, Draven, and her six-year-old daughter, Larsen, based on findings that ...

In re Nickolas T.

... ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge. Â¶ 1 In this appeal, the State of Arizona challenges the juvenile court's order vacating its prior order that had required appellee Nickolas T. to register as a sex offender in connection with his 2003 delinquency adjudication for sexual assault. ...

In re Michelle G.

... 1 Michelle G. appeals from the juvenile court's January 2007 order that she pay restitution to the victim of criminal damage she had committed in 2004. She contends the juvenile court abused its discretion by ordering restitution after her disposition had become final. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Gray Mountain Juvenile Law Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Chad Joshua Winger

Jacqueline A Kozlik

Brent Davidson Harris

Brent Davidson Harris

Bruce W Griffin

Bruce W Griffin

Benjamin L Deguire

Benjamin L Deguire

Gary Pearlmutter

Jacqueline P Fisk-Glazer

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INFORMED CONSENT

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

JURY NULLIFICATION

CHARGE

ARRAIGNMENT

ACCOMPLICE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

CRIMINAL INSANITY

NOLO CONTENDERE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

DENISE R. v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF ECONOMIC SEC.

In re Nickolas T.

In re Michelle G.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details