Hemet DUI-DWI Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Elliott N. Kanter
About | Practice Areas
The Law Office of Elliott N. Kanter
2445 5th Avenue Suite 350 San Diego, CA 92101» view map
Accident & Injury Law
When Experience Matters Most

San Diego attorney Elliott Kanter has served criminal defense and personal injury clients for 40 years. Get compassionate legal service.

800-641-9290
1. Elliott N. Kanter San Diego, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 1980
  Thomas Jefferson School of Law J.D.
2. AboutThe Law Office of Elliott N. Kanter
  When Experience Matters Most
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Kirby Combs

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Murrieta, CA 92563

Nicolai Cocis

Criminal, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

25026 Las Brisas Rd., Murrieta, CA 92562

Margie Brakhage

Juvenile Law, Traffic, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

29995 Technology Drive, Murrieta, CA 92563

Nicolaie Cocis

Computer Law, Domestic Violence & Neglect, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

25026 Las Brisas Rd, Murrieta, CA 92562

Nicole Quijano Valera

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

30111 Technology Dr, Murrieta, CA 92563

Parwana Anwar

Domestic Violence & Neglect, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

38975 Sky Canyon Dr., Murrieta, CA 92563

James Melvin Taylor

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

66 West Ramsey Street, Banning, CA 92220

Joseph Vincent Camarata

Domestic Violence & Neglect, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

41715 Enterprise Circle North, Temecula, CA 92590

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

SENTENCE

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by ... (more...)

Punishment in a criminal case. A sentence can range from a fine and community service to life imprisonment or death. For most crimes, the sentence is chosen by the trial judge; the jury chooses the sentence only in a capital case, when it must choose between life in prison without parole and death.

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. McNeal

... liquor" in violation of the generic DUI law. (Id., 772 A.2d at pp. 1088, 1091.) The Vermont Supreme Court agreed. (Id. at p. 1091.) The court observed that "any evidence raising a doubt as to [the] defendant's condition, which is the ultimate question in a generic DWI prosecution . ...

People v. Landon

... OPINION. LAMBDEN, J.â€”. On August 14, 2008, defendant pleaded guilty to driving under the influence (DUI) with a blood-alcohol level greater than 0.08 percent (Veh. Code, Â§ 23152, subd. (b)); she admitted four prior DUI 1099 convictions. ...

People v. Patel

... In exchange for a grant of probation, defendant Javid Patel entered negotiated pleas of no contest to alternative felony counts of "generic" and "per se" [1] negligent driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) that resulted in bodily injury to another, and a misdemeanor count of ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Hemet DUI-DWI Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Office of Elliott N. Kanter

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Kirby Combs

Nicolai Cocis

Margie Brakhage

Nicolaie Cocis

Nicole Quijano Valera

Parwana Anwar

James Melvin Taylor

Joseph Vincent Camarata

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BAIL

MENS REA

SENTENCE

HOMICIDE

ACQUITTAL

GRAND JURY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

INTERROGATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. McNeal

People v. Landon

People v. Patel

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details