Hildale Juvenile Law Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

William Melton
About | Practice Areas
Melton Law
5955 South Redwood Road Suite 103 Taylorsville, UT 84123» view map
Criminal Defense and Accident & Injury
Legal Expertise You Can Rely On

Melton Law is dedicated to providing competent and great representation to our clients. We will be there to help you and answer any questions you have every step of the way.

800-952-9770
1. William Melton Taylorsville, UT
  Attorney at Law- UT, 2019
  University of Idaho College of Law, J.D. 2019
2. AboutMelton Law
  Legal Expertise You Can Rely On
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Hildale Juvenile Law lawyer.
Below are all Hildale Criminal lawyers.

J. Robert Latham

Juvenile Law, Other, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3143 South 840 East, Saint George, UT 84790

Paul Rowland Graff

Business, Contract, Trusts, Juvenile Law, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

162 N. 400 E., Saint George, UT 84770

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

STATE EX REL. KF

... meaningful appellate review. I. THE JUVENILE COURT HAD SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. ... A. There Was Sufficient Evidence for the Juvenile Court to Determine That the Mother Failed to Comply With Her Service Plan. Â¶ 45 At the ...

Whitney v. DIV. OF JUVENILE JUSTICE SERV.

Â¶ 4 At the hearing, the juvenile court directed Juvenile Services to perform an observation and assessment of Dillon. The juvenile court later ordered Juvenile Services to transfer Dillon to a community-based placement. Juvenile Services placed Dillon in the community-based ...

STATE EX REL. ACM

... II. THE JUVENILE COURT HAD JURISDICTION TO HEAR THE PETITION TO TERMINATE MR. NUOSCI'S PARENTAL RIGHTS. ... IV. THE JUVENILE COURT STATED LEGALLY SUFFICIENT GROUNDS TO TERMINATE MR. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Hildale Juvenile Law Lawyer, Utah

Sponsored Law Firm

Melton Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS