Holt Misdemeanor Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Timothy L. Hensick
About | Practice Areas
Timothy L. Hensick & Associates, P.C.
528 West Grand River Avenue Howell, MI 48843» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Dedicated. Professional. Diligent.

My practice has been built on long hours of hard work, by dedicating myself to properly handling cases for clients, & by listening carefully to my clients.

800-970-6510
1. Timothy L. Hensick Howell, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 1978
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School J.D.
2. AboutTimothy L. Hensick & Associates, P.C.
  Dedicated. Professional. Diligent.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Holt Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Holt Criminal lawyers.

Bernard F. Finn

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

3380 Pinetree Rd, Lansing, MI 48911

Robert B. Ebersole

Veterans' Affairs, Other, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1717 Heather Haven Dr, Holt, MI 48842

Terry R. Blundell

Criminal, Family Law

Status: Suspended Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

2214 Depot St, Holt, MI 48842

Elias G. Kafantaris

Other, Estate Planning, Criminal, Elder Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

1515 W Mount Hope Ave, Lansing, MI 48910

Ina R. O'Briant

Litigation, Divorce, Criminal, Children's Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

Mason, MI 48854

Mark H. Canady

Criminal, Litigation

Status: Suspended Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

6810 S Cedar St, Lansing, MI 48911

Robert Joseph Palmer

Agriculture, Criminal, Animal Bite, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

3380 Pinetree Rd, Lansing, MI 48911

Lisa Kay Hagen

Litigation, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

3380 Pinetree Rd, Lansing, MI 48911

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

BAILIFF

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to mai... (more...)

A court official usually classified as a peace officer (sometimes as a deputy sheriff, or marshal) and usually wearing a uniform. A bailiff's main job is to maintain order in the courtroom. In addition, bailiffs often help court proceedings go smoothly by shepherding witnesses in and out of the courtroom and handing evidence to witnesses as they testify. In criminal cases, the bailiff may have temporary charge of any defendant who is in custody during court proceedings.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Wilder

... And that was that. So, the People have to show that the defendant entered without permission, for the purpose of committing a misdemeanor, taking property, or committing a felony. That his body did go in, so he entered without the owner's permission. ...

People v. Sadows

... and remand for further proceedings. 96 I. In Docket No. 286689, defendant, Colleen Sadows, was charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), MCL 257.625(1), a misdemeanor. Because Sadows was previously ...

People v. Reid

... SAWYER, J. This case presents the question whether the circuit court possesses the jurisdiction 160 to try a defendant on a misdemeanor charge when the accompanying felony charge was dismissed before the beginning of trial. ... Thus, only the misdemeanor charge remained. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Holt Misdemeanor Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Timothy L. Hensick & Associates, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Bernard F. Finn

Robert B. Ebersole

Terry R. Blundell

Elias G. Kafantaris

Ina R. O'Briant

Mark H. Canady

Robert Joseph Palmer

Lisa Kay Hagen

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-INCRIMINATION

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

INFORMED CONSENT

ACCOMPLICE

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

LINEUP

INTERROGATION

BAILIFF

LARCENY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Wilder

People v. Sadows

People v. Reid

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details