Holtsville Criminal Lawyer, New York

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Adrienne D. Edward
About | Practice Areas
Law Office of Adrienne D. Edward P.C.
549 Summit Ave Jersey City, NJ 07306» view map
Criminal Defense & Family Law
Effective Legal Strategies

Our practice is committed to serving the unique needs of every client. We strive to make you feel heard, valued, and empowered at every stage of the legal process.

201-420-8850
1. Adrienne D. Edward Jersey City, NJ
  Attorney at Law- NJ, 1994
  Seton Hall University School of Law, J.D. 1994
2. AboutLaw Office of Adrienne D. Edward P.C.
  Effective Legal Strategies
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Albert Eugene Norato

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Traffic, Motor Vehicle

Who is Albert E. Norato, Jr.? He is not just some white-collared reclusive lawyer who works for the nice sports care and lavish lifestyle. Mr. Norato ... (more)

CONTACT

800-861-0490

285 Sills Road, East Patchogue, NY 11772

Brian Todd Epstein

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Real Estate

Attorney Epstein graduated with his J.D. from Touro College. Attorney Epstein practices Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Estate, and... (more)

CONTACT

631-698-3900

1305 Middle Country Rd, Selden, NY 11784

Ed Simeone

Divorce & Family Law, Child Custody, Child Support, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

228 East Main Street, Patchogue, NY 11772

Mel Jacoby

Bankruptcy & Debt, Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1737 N Ocean Ave, Medford, NY 11763

Robert Walter Dapelo

Accident & Injury, Bankruptcy, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

110 North Ocean Avenue, Patchogue, NY 11772

Philip J De Bellis

Mediation, DUI-DWI, Divorce, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

2459 Ocean Ave, Ronkonkoma, NY 11779

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

JURY

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision,... (more...)

Criminal Law Traffic TicketshomeGLOSSARY jury A group of people selected to apply the law, as stated by the judge, to the facts of a case and render a decision, called the verdict. Traditionally, an American jury was made up of 12 people who had to arrive at a unanimous decision. But today, in many states, juries in civil cases may be composed of as few as six members and non-unanimous verdicts may be permitted. (Most states still require 12-person, unanimous verdicts for criminal trials.) Tracing its history back over 1,000 years, the jury system was brought to England by William the Conqueror in 1066. The philosophy behind the jury system is that--especially in a criminal case--an accused's guilt or innocence should be judged by a group of people from her community ('a jury of her peers'). Recently, some courts have been experimenting with increasing the traditionally rather passive role of the jury by encouraging jurors to take notes and ask questions.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Hawkins

... The issue common to these otherwise unrelated criminal appeals is the preservation for this Court's review of defendants' challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence. ... A grand jury indicted all three defendants for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. ...

People v. Kalin

... from the glove compartment. Defendant and the other occupants of the car were arrested for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree and unlawful possession of marijuana. At his arraignment the ...

People v. Sparber

... 464 Kaye Scholer LLP, New York City (David Klingsberg and Max Schwartz of counsel), and Legal Aid Society, Criminal Practice Division (Steven Banks, Seymour James and Andrew Fine of counsel), for Legal Aid Society, amicus curiae in the five above-entitled actions. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Holtsville Criminal Lawyer, New York

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Office of Adrienne D. Edward P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Albert Eugene Norato

Brian Todd Epstein

Ed Simeone

Mel Jacoby

Robert Walter Dapelo

Philip J De Bellis

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

BURDEN OF PROOF

WARRANT

JURY

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

VENIREMEN

SELF-DEFENSE

SPECIFIC INTENT

INSANITY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Hawkins

People v. Kalin

People v. Sparber

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details