Jamestown Criminal Lawyer, Virginia

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jack T. Randall
About | Practice Areas
Randall, Page, & Bruch, P.C.
28319 Southampton Pkwy Suite B Courtland, VA 23837» view map
Criminal Defense
Trusted. Creative. Responsive.

Our solid qualifications as individual legal professionals, our well-oiled teamwork and our dedication to our clients’ best interests are hallmarks of our law practice.

800-759-7991
1. Jack T. Randall Courtland, VA
  Attorney at Law - VA, 2004
  Regent University J.D. 2004
2. AboutRandall, Page, & Bruch, P.C.
  Local Attorneys. Trusted Experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Paul Freeman

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Motor Vehicle, Lawsuit & Dispute

Lawyer Paul Freeman earned his Bachelor of Science degree at Norfolk State University and his master’s degree at the same university. Following his ... (more)

CONTACT

800-489-4410

4311 New Town Avenue, Williamsburg, VA 23188

Michael Andrew Hyman

Traffic, Criminal, Car Accident, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

1307 Jamestown Road, Williamsburg, VA 23185

Richard Hikmat Rizk

Motor Vehicle, Litigation, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1177 Jamestown Road, Williamsburg, VA 23185

Robert G. Saunders

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Civil Rights, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1311 Jamestown Road, Williamsburg, VA 23185

Richard Gerard Collins

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1307 Jamestown Rd, Williamsburg, VA 23185

Christine Rock DeModna

Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1001 Richmond Road, Williamsburg, VA 23185

C. Thomas Turbeville

DUI-DWI, Traffic, Personal Injury, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

4805 Courthouse Street, Williamsburg, VA 23188

Laura Rose Killinger

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

613 South Henry Street, Williamsburg, VA 23185

Paige Nestel

Intellectual Property, Criminal, Entertainment, Labor Law

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Jamestown, VA 23081

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Magruder v. Com.

... Because the procedure provided in Code Â§ 19.2-187.1 adequately protects a criminal defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause and because the defendants in these appeals failed to utilize that procedure, we conclude that they waived the challenges under the ...

McCain v. Com.

... 335, 340, 288 SE2d 475, 478 (1982). Under well-settled principles of law, police officers may stop a person for the purpose of investigating possible criminal behavior even though no probable cause exists for an arrest. Terry, 392 US at 22, 88 S.Ct. 1868. ...

McMorris v. Com.

... This was all contemporaneous. Therefore[,] the robbery statute applies." In refusing McMorris' petition for appeal, the Court of Appeals concluded that the evidence established that McMorris shared the criminal intent of those who did steal Ottey's telephone and other items. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Jamestown Criminal Lawyer, Virginia

Sponsored Law Firm

Randall, Page, & Bruch, P.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Paul Freeman

Michael Andrew Hyman

Richard Hikmat Rizk

Robert G. Saunders

Richard Gerard Collins

Christine Rock DeModna

C. Thomas Turbeville

Laura Rose Killinger

Paige Nestel

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INTERROGATION

IMPRISON

MISTRIAL

JURY NULLIFICATION

SELF-DEFENSE

SPECIFIC INTENT

LINEUP

PROSECUTE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Magruder v. Com.

McCain v. Com.

McMorris v. Com.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details