Lake Aluma Criminal Lawyer, Oklahoma

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Monty Pritchett
About | Practice Areas
Pritchett Law Group
126 West Needles Avenue Bixby, OK 74008» view map
Estate Law
A Focus On Results

Don't wait! Contact us for a free phone consultation. Let us help you figure out what your next best steps are

918-509-3891
1. Monty Pritchett Bixby, OK
  Attorney at Law, OK
  University of Oklahoma College of Law, J.D.
2. AboutPritchett Law Group
  A Focus On Results
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Randy Bumgarner

✓ VERIFIED

Divorce & Family Law, Bad Faith Insurance, Criminal, Accident & Injury, Estate

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-919-8730

101 Park Avenue, Suite 410, Oklahoma City, OK 73102

Scott D. Harris

Divorce & Family Law, Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, Car Accident, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1715 N. Broadway Ave, Oklahoma City, OK 73103

Dustin J. Hopson

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

512 NW 12th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73103

C. Michael Robbins

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Traffic, White Collar Crime

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

120 N. Robinson Ave., Oklahoma City, OK 73102

J. Christopher Daniels

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Products Liability

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

435 North Walker Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK 73102

J. David Ogle

Securities, Constitutional Law, DUI-DWI, Litigation

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

100 Park Avenue, Oklahoma City, OK 73102

Bryan Stratton

Criminal, Farms, DUI-DWI, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

116 S Walker Ave, Oklahoma City, OK 73102

Nicole Marie Nash

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

400 Ne 50Th St, Oklahoma City, OK 73105

Howard Tremayne Morrow

Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

429 Ne 50Th St, Oklahoma City, OK 73105

Daniel K. Zorn

Workers' Compensation, Criminal, Civil Rights, Insurance, Household Mold

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

429 N.E. 50Th, Oklahoma City, OK 73105

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

LARCENY

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the inten... (more...)

Another term for theft. Although the definition of this term differs from state to state, it typically means taking property belonging to another with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. If the taking is non forceful, it is larceny; if it is accompanied by force or fear directed against a person, it is robbery, a much more serious offense.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Leftwich v. Court of Criminal Appeals

Â¶ 2 The Supreme Court heard oral argument from the Petitioner, Real Party in Interest, and Amicus Curiae. Counsel for Petitioner, counsel for the Real Party in Interest, and counsel for Amicus Curiae all agreed during oral argument that certain issues raised herein were not raised, ...

Ochoa v. Bass

... Respondents. No. HC-2007-1120. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. March 12, 2008. ... hearing. We do not decide whether the trial court can or should ask such questions in any other stage of criminal proceedings prior to sentencing. ...

Nilsen v. State

... No. M-2007-285. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. February 27, 2009. ... 2 Appellant raises the following proposition of error: 1. The stop of Appellant's vehicle was not based on the reasonable suspicion that Appellant was engaged in criminal activity. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Lake Aluma Criminal Lawyer, Oklahoma

Sponsored Law Firm

Pritchett Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Randy Bumgarner

Scott D. Harris

Dustin J. Hopson

C. Michael Robbins

J. Christopher Daniels

J. David Ogle

Bryan Stratton

Nicole Marie Nash

Howard Tremayne Morrow

Daniel K. Zorn

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

ACCOMPLICE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

HUNG JURY

INTERROGATION

SELF-INCRIMINATION

PROBABLE CAUSE

SEARCH WARRANT

LARCENY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Leftwich v. Court of Criminal Appeals

Ochoa v. Bass

Nilsen v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details