Long Lake Felony Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jacob Cristoforo
About | Practice Areas
Jacob A. Cristoforo PLLC
P.O. Box 146 Kawkawlin, MI 48631» view map
Criminal Defense
Fighting For Your Rights

If you are looking to hire a lawyer in Michigan, Jacob Cristoforo will be happy to help you. Attorney Cristoforo specializes in Criminal Defense.

800-892-7670
1. Jacob Cristoforo Kawkawlin, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 2011
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School J.D.
2. AboutJacob A. Cristoforo PLLC
  Legal Expertise You Can Rely On
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Long Lake Felony lawyer.
Below are all Long Lake Criminal lawyers.

Melissa Kathleen Wangler

Criminal, Children's Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

3156 W M 76, West Branch, MI 48661

Casandra L. Morse-Bills

Criminal, Family Law, Children's Rights, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

105 S Court St, Mio, MI 48647

Barry L. Shantz

Criminal

Status: Suspended Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

520 E 13th St, Mio, MI 48647

Jon R. Macdonald

Criminal, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

420 W Houghton Ave, West Branch, MI 48661

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

WARRANT

See search warrant or arrest warrant.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

CHARGE

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evid... (more...)

A formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

BAILOR

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in or... (more...)

Someone who delivers an item of personal property to another person for a specific purpose. For example, a person who leaves a broken VCR with a repairman in order to get it fixed would be a bailor.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Ream

... Opinion. MARKMAN, J. At issue here is whether convicting and sentencing a defendant for both first-degree felony murder and the predicate felony 538 violates the "multiple punishments" strand of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States and Michigan constitutions. ...

People v. Gardner

... This Court has ruled that the statutes imply that each predicate felony must arise from separate criminal incidents. ... Therefore, multiple felonies that arise from the same criminal incident or transaction count as a single felony under the habitual offender laws. ...

People v. Idziak

... In this case, we consider whether a parolee who is convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment for a felony committed while on parole is entitled, under Michigan's jail credit statute, MCL 769.11b, to credit for time served in jail after his arrest on the new offense and ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Long Lake Felony Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Jacob A. Cristoforo PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Melissa Kathleen Wangler

Casandra L. Morse-Bills

Barry L. Shantz

Jon R. Macdonald

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SEARCH WARRANT

WARRANT

SPECIFIC INTENT

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

CHARGE

SELF-DEFENSE

BAILOR

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Ream

People v. Gardner

People v. Idziak

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details