Lox Felony Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Joseph Gasparro
About | Practice Areas
Joseph A. Gasparro, PA
813 Jackson Rd Jacksonville, FL 32225» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Serving the Best Interests Of Our Clients

When you need accurate representation for criminal defense issues, Joseph Gasparro is there for you.

800-971-8621
1. Joseph Gasparro Jacksonville, FL
  Attorney at Law- FL, 2015
  Florida Coastal School of Law, J.D. 2015
2. AboutJoseph A. Gasparro, PA
  Serving the Best Interests Of Our Clients
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Douglas Ian Leifert

Criminal, Domestic Violence & Neglect, DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor

Douglas Leifert is a lawyer in West Palm Beach who focuses on Assault cases. He has tried cases involving drug charges, domestic violence, DUI, probat... (more)

CONTACT

561-833-4300

2101 Vista Pkwy, West Palm Beach, FL 33411

Catherine M. Mazzullo

Federal, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

3003 S. Congress Avenue, Lake Worth, FL 33461

Dean Joseph Merten

Misdemeanor, Felony, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

8295 N. Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410

Guy Fronstin

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, White Collar Crime

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

515 North Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Rosalie Melissa Cruz

Family Law, Felony

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

1601 Forum Pl, West Palm Beach, FL 33401

Fernanda Brandao Tennyson

Other, Family Law, Felony, Business

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

154 Indigo River Pt, Jupiter, FL 33478

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

CONSTABLE

A peace officer for a particular geographic area -- most often a rural county -- who commonly has the power to serve legal papers, arrest lawbreakers and keep t... (more...)

A peace officer for a particular geographic area -- most often a rural county -- who commonly has the power to serve legal papers, arrest lawbreakers and keep the peace. Depending on the state, a constable may be similar to a marshal or sheriff.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Martinez v. State

... See id. at 1167. The instructions given to the jury with regard to self-defense included the forcible-felony instruction, as follows: However, the use of force likely to cause death or great bodily harm is not justifiable if you find: 1 ...

Bevel v. State

... of Sims. The trial court found one aggravator applicable to both murder counts, namely, that the defendant was previously convicted of a capital offense or of a felony involving the use or threat of violence to some person. The ...

Lebron v. State

... During the guilt phase of the second trial, the jury found the following on special-verdict forms: (1) Lebron was guilty of first-degree felony murder; (2) Oliver was killed by someone other than Lebron; (3) Lebron did not possess a firearm during the commission of the felony ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Lox Felony Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

Joseph A. Gasparro, PA

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Douglas Ian Leifert

Catherine M. Mazzullo

Dean Joseph Merten

Guy Fronstin

Rosalie Melissa Cruz

Fernanda Brandao Tennyson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SPECIFIC INTENT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

CONSTABLE

INTENTIONAL TORT

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

BURDEN OF PROOF

INFORMED CONSENT

DIRECTED VERDICT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Martinez v. State

Bevel v. State

Lebron v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details