Medina Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Cristine Beckwith
About | Practice Areas
Cristine Beckwith, Attorney at Law
1115 Tacoma Ave S Tacoma, WA 98402» view map
Criminal Defense Law
An Attorney Who Never Gives Up

Cristine Beckwith is a Tacoma criminal lawyer who is dedicated to defending her clients. She is a zealous advocate and proven negotiator who will work hard for you.

253-238-8273
1. Cristine Beckwith Tacoma, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 2004
  Gonzaga University J.D. 2004
2. AboutCristine Beckwith, Attorney at Law
  An Attorney Who Never Gives Up
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Jason Newcombe

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Bankruptcy & Debt, Accident & Injury, Traffic

From our offices in Seattle and throughout the state of Washington, we help families solve difficult legal problems and move on with their lives. ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-699-2370

10900 NE 8th Street, Bellevue, WA 98004

Lennard A. Nahajski

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Felony, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI

Mr. Nahajski graduated from the University of Washington with a bachelor’s degree in Political Science in 1989, from the University of Oregon School... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-952-8320

10900 NE Fourth Street, Bellevue, WA 98004

Brad A. Meryhew

Other, , Criminal, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

600 1st Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104

Harold F. Vhugen

Litigation, Child Custody, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

720 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104

John R. Crowley

White Collar Crime, Criminal, Constitutional Law, Antitrust

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

The Smith Tower, 506 2nd Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104

Rayne J. Nelson

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

318 First Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98104

Robert D. Rhodes

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Administrative Law, Business

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

918 South Horton Street, Seattle, WA 98134

Steve C. Karimi

Traffic, Criminal, Business Organization, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

119 First Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98104

Aaron A Pelley

White Collar Crime, Civil Rights, Merger & Acquisition, Corporate, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

119 1St Ave S, Seattle, WA 98104

Aaron J. Wolff

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

720 3rd Ave, Seattle, WA 98104

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

CRIMINAL CASE

A lawsuit brought by a prosecutor employed by the federal, state or local government that charges a person with the commission of a crime.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

CONVICTION

A finding by a judge or jury that the defendant is guilty of a crime.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

HABEAS CORPUS

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continu... (more...)

Latin for 'You have the body.' A prisoner files a petition for writ of habeas corpus in order to challenge the authority of the prison or jail warden to continue to hold him. If the judge orders a hearing after reading the writ, the prisoner gets to argue that his confinement is illegal. These writs are frequently filed by convicted prisoners who challenge their conviction on the grounds that the trial attorney failed to prepare the defense and was incompetent. Prisoners sentenced to death also file habeas petitions challenging the constitutionality of the state death penalty law. Habeas writs are different from and do not replace appeals, which are arguments for reversal of a conviction based on claims that the judge conducted the trial improperly. Often, convicted prisoners file both.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Medina Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

Cristine Beckwith, Attorney at Law

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jason Newcombe

Lennard A. Nahajski

Brad A. Meryhew

Harold F. Vhugen

John R. Crowley

Rayne J. Nelson

Robert D. Rhodes

Steve C. Karimi

Aaron A Pelley

Aaron J. Wolff

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

CRIMINAL CASE

ACQUITTAL

JURY NULLIFICATION

CONVICTION

INTERROGATION

CONTINGENCY FEE

HABEAS CORPUS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details