Mercer Island Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jason Newcombe
About Us | Services
The Law Offices of Jason S. Newcombe
10700 Meridian Ave N #108 Seattle, WA 98133Â» view map
Criminal Defense, DWI/DUI, Misdemeanor
CONTACT US FOR A CONSULTATION

Our Washington State lawyers have the resources, the knowledge, and the experience to assist you with your legal matter in our practice areas.

800-699-2370
1. Jason Newcombe Seattle, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 1999
  Boston College Law School, J.D. - 1997
2. About UsServing Washington
  Offices in Seattle, Bellevue, Tacoma, Everett, and Olympia
3. ServicesExperienced Attorneys
  We always offer a free initial consultation and case evaluation
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Jason Newcombe

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Bankruptcy & Debt, Accident & Injury, Traffic

From our offices in Seattle and throughout the state of Washington, we help families solve difficult legal problems and move on with their lives. ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-699-2370

10900 NE 8th Street, Bellevue, WA 98004

Lennard A. Nahajski

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Felony, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI

Mr. Nahajski graduated from the University of Washington with a bachelor’s degree in Political Science in 1989, from the University of Oregon School... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-952-8320

10900 NE Fourth Street, Bellevue, WA 98004

Shanece Malena Dedeaux

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal

Ms. Shanece M. Dedeaux has been serving the Greater Seattle area with proven success. She has successfully litigated Trust and Estate matters, Contrac... (more)

CONTACT

206-333-0448

1400 112th Ave SE, Bellevue, WA 98004

Robert D. Rhodes

Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal, Administrative Law, Business

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

918 South Horton Street, Seattle, WA 98134

Holli Giffin

Criminal, Felony, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 20 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

918 South Horton St., Seattle, WA 98134

Howard S. Stein

Traffic, Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2840 Northup Way, Bellevue, WA 98004

Karen Renee Elizabeth Judy

Other, Federal Appellate Practice, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

3236 78Th Ave Se, Mercer Island, WA 98040

John J. Polito

Criminal, Landlord-Tenant, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

9 Lake Bellevue Dr, Bellevue, WA 98005

Robert Perez

White Collar Crime, Misdemeanor, Felony, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1520 140th Avenue N.E., Bellevue, WA 98005

Jennifer Ellen Smith

Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

1126 34Th Ave, Seattle, WA 98122

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Mercer Island Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Jason S. Newcombe

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jason Newcombe

Lennard A. Nahajski

Shanece Malena Dedeaux

Robert D. Rhodes

Holli Giffin

Howard S. Stein

Karen Renee Elizabeth Judy

John J. Polito

Robert Perez

Jennifer Ellen Smith

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CORPUS DELECTI

INFORMED CONSENT

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

BURGLARY

INSANITY

JURY NULLIFICATION

BURDEN OF PROOF

FEDERAL COURT

PLEA BARGAIN

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details