Morton Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jason Newcombe
About Us | Services
The Law Offices of Jason S. Newcombe
Proudly Serving The Greater Puget Sound RegionÂ» view map
Criminal Defense, DWI/DUI, Misdemeanor
CONTACT US FOR A CONSULTATION

Our Washington State lawyers have the resources, the knowledge, and the experience to assist you with your legal matter in our practice areas.

800-699-2370
1. Jason Newcombe Seattle, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 1999
  Boston College Law School, J.D. - 1997
2. About UsServing Washington
  Offices in Seattle, Bellevue, Tacoma, Everett, and Olympia
3. ServicesExperienced Attorneys
  We always offer a free initial consultation and case evaluation
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Mark Stanley Brumbaugh

✓ VERIFIED

Accident & Injury, Medical Malpractice, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Estate

Licensed in both Washington and Oregon

Mr. Brumbaugh is the senior shareholder of Walstead Mertsching. He joined the firm in 1992 and has been a shareholder since 1996. He primarily repre... (more)

CONTACT

360-423-5220

1700 Hudson Street, Longview, WA 98632

M. Preston White

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony, Traffic

Preston White is an attorney representing clients in criminal and family law cases in Olympia, Washington, and the surrounding counties. While serving... (more)

CONTACT

800-795-6130

1800 Cooper Pt Rd SW, Olympia, WA 98502

Jason Newcombe

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Bankruptcy & Debt, Accident & Injury, Traffic

From our offices in Seattle and throughout the state of Washington, we help families solve difficult legal problems and move on with their lives. ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-699-2370

3025 Limited Ln NW, Olympia, WA 98502

Breckan Scott

Lawsuit & Dispute, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

Yelm, WA 98597

Christine D. Langley

Estate Planning, Estate, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

Rainier, WA 98576

W. Keith Goody

Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights, Venture Capital

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Cougar, WA 98616

Clifford Randolph Kuhn

Civil Rights, Family Law, Personal Injury, Criminal

Status: Deceased Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

187 Aaron Dr, Kelso, WA 98626

Matthew Joseph Kuehnl

Family Law, Traffic, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 9 Years

CONTACT

20 Sw 12Th St, Chehalis, WA 98532

Jakob Daniel Mcghie

Commercial Real Estate, Landlord-Tenant, Traffic, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

114 W Magnolia St, Centralia, WA 98531

David W Brown

Real Estate, Family Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

107 S Tower Ave, Centralia, WA 98531

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Morton Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Offices of Jason S. Newcombe

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Mark Stanley Brumbaugh

M. Preston White

Jason Newcombe

Breckan Scott

Christine D. Langley

W. Keith Goody

Clifford Randolph Kuhn

Matthew Joseph Kuehnl

Jakob Daniel Mcghie

David W Brown

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

NOLLE PROSEQUI

VENIREMEN

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

JURY NULLIFICATION

NOLO CONTENDERE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

INFRACTION

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

PLEA

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details