North Freedom Criminal Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

David Saperstein
About | Practice Areas
Hurley Burish, S.C.
33 East Main Street Suite 400 Madison, WI 53703» view map
Estate and Criminal Defense Law
A Law Firm You Can Trust

Dedicated to providing clients with the comprehensive, creative, and thorough work.

608-257-0945
1. David Saperstein Madison, WI
  Attorney at Law- WI
  DePaul University College of Law, J.D. 1995
2. AboutHurley Burish, S.C.
  A Law Firm You Can Trust
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

David M. Stegall

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Accident & Injury, Workers' Compensation, Animal Bite

David M. Stegall is a shareholder at Lawton & Cates who was admitted to the Wisconsin Bar in 2006 after graduating cum laude from Marquette University... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

608-282-6200

345 W Washington Ave, Madison, WI 53701

David E. Saperstein

✓ VERIFIED

Criminal, Traffic, DUI-DWI

David E. Saperstein is first, and foremost, a trial lawyer. He is in his element, at his best, when he is advocating for his clients in the courtroom.... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

608-257-0945

33 East Main Street, Madison, WI 53703

Matthew D. Moeser

Other, Litigation, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

33 East Main Street, Madison, WI 53703

Steven W. Zaleski

Farms, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

10 East Doty Street, Madison, WI 53703

Joseph L. Viney

Real Estate, Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

137 3Rd Ave, Baraboo, WI 53913

Jay M. Englund

White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

214 1St Street, Baraboo, WI 53913

Puck Tsai

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

214 1st Street, Baraboo, WI 53913

John M. Gerlach

Government, Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

131 W Wilson St, Reedsburg, WI 53959

Myron E. LaRowe

Government, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 60 Years

CONTACT

110 Main Street, Reedsburg, WI 53959

Patrick J. Taggart

Real Estate, Estate, Criminal, Business

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1730 Community Dr, Sauk City, WI 53583

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, th... (more...)

Circumstances that increase the seriousness or outrageousness of a given crime, and that in turn increase the wrongdoer's penalty or punishment. For example, the crime of aggravated assault is a physical attack made worse because it is committed with a dangerous weapon, results in severe bodily injury or is made in conjunction with another serious crime. Aggravated assault is usually considered a felony, punishable by a prison sentence.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kramer

... Id. Â¶ 11 A primary question the court of appeals addressed was whether evidence of Wagner's subjective belief that criminal activity might be taking place operated to preclude his conduct from coming within the scope of his community caretaker function. Id., Â¶ 13. ...

State v. Harris

... I. Did the State violate Wis. Stat. Â§ 971.23(1) (the criminal discovery statute) or the ... Stat. Â§ 971.23(1) (the criminal discovery statute) by failing to disclose timely the defendant's request to put on a particular pair of pants? If so, was the defendant prejudiced by the violation? III. ...

State v. Schaefer

... 2 After permitting Schaefer's interlocutory appeal, the court of appeals certified the following question to this court: "Does a criminal defendant have a subpoena right to obtain and copy police investigation reports and nonprivileged materials prior to the preliminary hearing ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

North Freedom Criminal Lawyer, Wisconsin

Sponsored Law Firm

Hurley Burish, S.C.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

David M. Stegall

David E. Saperstein

Matthew D. Moeser

Steven W. Zaleski

Joseph L. Viney

Jay M. Englund

Puck Tsai

John M. Gerlach

Myron E. LaRowe

Patrick J. Taggart

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

GRAND JURY

DIRECTED VERDICT

ACQUITTAL

AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES

HOT PURSUIT

EAVESDROPPING

SELF-INCRIMINATION

SPECIFIC INTENT

CRIMINAL LAW

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Kramer

State v. Harris

State v. Schaefer

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details