Ortonville Felony Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Thomas Piotrowski
About | Practice Areas
The Law Office of Thomas Piotrowski
105 Pearl St Ypsilanti, MI 48197Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Proudly Serving Washtenaw County

You need an attorney with criminal defense knowledge who will vigorously protect your rights and interests.

800-893-2781
1. Thomas Piotrowski Ypsilanti, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 1987
  Michigan State University J.D. 1987
2. AboutThe Law Office of Thomas Piotrowski
  Over 30 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Christopher Wayne Quinn II

✓ VERIFIED

Felony, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Traffic, Bankruptcy

Criminal Defense Attorney Handeling Felony and Misdemeanor Cases

At the law offices of Quinn and associates our motto is knowledge, excellence, and determination. The professionals at The Law Offices of Quinn & Asso... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-645-3790

400 Monroe, Suite 290, Detroit, MI 48226

Sarah E. Blalock

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Felony, Grand Jury Proceedings

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

30445 Northwestern Highway, Farmington, MI 48334

Stacey M. Washington

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

214 South Main Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Joshua Duane Jones

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

3906 Baldwin Rd. #210017, Auburn Hills, MI 48321

Robert L. Levi

Employee Rights, Felony, Discrimination, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

4125 Cumberland Ct, Commerce Township, MI 48390

David Rudoi

DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor, Felony, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

7 West Square Lake Rd., Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302

Jessica M Lashier

Traffic, Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

167 South Main Street, Romeo, MI 48065

Kathleen Wilson Fink

DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime, RICO Act, Felony, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

280 North Old Woodward, Birmingham, MI 48009

Daniel Hajji

DUI-DWI, Felony, Misdemeanor, Traffic

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

30300 Northwestern Highway, Farmington, MI 48334

Andrew Hubbs

Felony, Misdemeanor, White Collar Crime, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

44444 Mound Road, Sterling Heights, MI 48314

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the l... (more...)

The crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, including prescription drugs. Complete intoxication is not required; the level of alcohol or drugs in the driver's body must simply be enough to prevent him from thinking clearly or driving safely. State laws specify the levels of blood alcohol content at which a person is presumed to be under the influence. Also called driving while intoxicated (DWI and drunk driving).

INFORMATION

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or ... (more...)

The name of the document, sometimes called a criminal complaint or petition in which a prosecutor charges a criminal defendant with a crime, either a felony or a misdemeanor. The information tells the defendant what crime he is charged with, against whom and when the offense allegedly occurred, but the prosecutor is not obliged to go into great detail. If the defendant wants more specifics, he must ask for it by way of a discovery request. Compare indictment.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Ream

... Opinion. MARKMAN, J. At issue here is whether convicting and sentencing a defendant for both first-degree felony murder and the predicate felony 538 violates the "multiple punishments" strand of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States and Michigan constitutions. ...

People v. Gardner

... This Court has ruled that the statutes imply that each predicate felony must arise from separate criminal incidents. ... Therefore, multiple felonies that arise from the same criminal incident or transaction count as a single felony under the habitual offender laws. ...

People v. Idziak

... In this case, we consider whether a parolee who is convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment for a felony committed while on parole is entitled, under Michigan's jail credit statute, MCL 769.11b, to credit for time served in jail after his arrest on the new offense and ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Ortonville Felony Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Office of Thomas Piotrowski

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Christopher Wayne Quinn II

Sarah E. Blalock

Stacey M. Washington

Joshua Duane Jones

Robert L. Levi

David Rudoi

Jessica M Lashier

Kathleen Wilson Fink

Daniel Hajji

Andrew Hubbs

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

SEARCH WARRANT

DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE (DUI)

INFORMATION

PROSECUTE

BURDEN OF PROOF

MOTION IN LIMINE

SELF-INCRIMINATION

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Ream

People v. Gardner

People v. Idziak

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details