Packwood DUI-DWI Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

James Hill
About | Practice Areas
Russell & Hill, PLLC
1212 North Washington St. Suite 132 Spokane, WA 99201» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Professional, Personal, Proven

You have questions, and we have answers. Here at Russell & Hill, PLLC, we know how to obtain the most favorable outcome for your particular circumstances.

800-928-5340
1. James Hill Spokane, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 2001
  Seattle University J.D. 2001
2. AboutRussell & Hill, PLLC
  Professional, Personal, Proven
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Packwood DUI-DWI lawyer.
Below are all Packwood Criminal lawyers.

Albert Wheeler

Workers' Compensation, DUI-DWI, Personal Injury, Car Accident

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

39th Ave at 25th Street SE, Puyallup, WA 98374

Charles M. Robbins

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

122 E Stewart Ave, Puyallup, WA 98372

Abram Gomez

Landlord-Tenant, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

3029 Destination Ave E, Fife, WA 98424

Dennis James Twichel

Traffic, White Collar Crime, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

4505 Pacific Hwy E, Tacoma, WA 98424

C. E. 'Monty' Hormel

Insurance, Elder Law, Federal, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 64 Years

CONTACT

Buckley, WA 98321

Krista Colleen White-Swain

Criminal, Private Judging

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

Enumclaw, WA 98022

Cynthia Marian Pandolfi

Employee Rights, White Collar Crime, Contract, Credit & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

40607 292Nd Ave Se, Enumclaw, WA 98022

Richard G. Welch

Criminal

Status: Inactive Licensed: 55 Years

CONTACT

Enumclaw, WA 98022

John Adams Moore

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3900 Nile Road, Naches, WA 98937

Richard Willis Bathum

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

46905 283Rd Ave Se, Enumclaw, WA 98022

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

BAIL BOND

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear... (more...)

The money posted by a 'bondsman' for a defendant who cannot afford his bail. The defendant pays a certain portion, usually 10%. If the defendant fails to appear for a court hearing, the judge can issue a warrant for his arrest and threaten to 'forfeit,' or keep, the money if the defendant doesn't appear soon. Usually, the bondsman will look for the defendant and bring him back, forcefully if necessary, in order to avoid losing the bail money.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

JURY NULLIFICATION

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for ... (more...)

A decision by the jury to acquit a defendant who has violated a law that the jury believes is unjust or wrong. Jury nullification has always been an option for juries in England and the United States, although judges will prevent a defense lawyer from urging the jury to acquit on this basis. Nullification was evident during the Vietnam war (when selective service protesters were acquitted by juries opposed to the war) and currently appears in criminal cases when the jury disagrees with the punishment--for example, in 'three strikes' cases when the jury realizes that conviction of a relatively minor offense will result in lifetime imprisonment.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Chambers

... Deborah A. Dwyer, King Co. Pros. Ofc./Appellate Unit, Seattle, WA, for Respondent. SCHINDLER, J. Â¶ 1 Under former RCW 46.61.502(6)(2007), the crime of driving while under the influence (DUI) is elevated from a gross ... We affirm the jury's conviction of felony DUI. FACTS. ...

State v. Eaton

... Michael C. Kinnie, Attorney at Law, Vancouver, WA, for Respondent. BRIDGEWATER, PJ. Â¶ 1 A jury convicted Thomas Eaton of one count of driving while under the influence (DUI) and one count of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, namely methamphetamine. ...

State v. Eaton

... CHAMBERS, J. Â¶ 1 Thomas Eaton was arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) and taken by police to the Clark County Jail. ... After performing field sobriety tests Officer Starks concluded that Eaton was impaired and arrested him for DUI. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Packwood DUI-DWI Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

Russell & Hill, PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Albert Wheeler

Charles M. Robbins

Abram Gomez

Dennis James Twichel

C. E. 'Monty' Hormel

Krista Colleen White-Swain

Cynthia Marian Pandolfi

Richard G. Welch

John Adams Moore

Richard Willis Bathum

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SELF-DEFENSE

BAIL BOND

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BURDEN OF PROOF

JURY NULLIFICATION

INDECENT EXPOSURE

NOLLE PROSEQUI

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

HOT PURSUIT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Chambers

State v. Eaton

State v. Eaton

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details