Parks Family Law Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm


Includes: Collaborative Law, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Paternity, Prenuptial Agreements

Daniel B. Kaiser Lawyer

Daniel B. Kaiser

VERIFIED
Personal Injury, Family Law, Criminal, Employment, Mass Torts
Experienced. Compassionate. Aggressive.

Daniel Kaiser is an experienced lawyer in Flagstaff, AZ. Mr. Kaiser has been practicing for over ten years and specializes in criminal law, family law... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

800-993-3450

Carson T. H. Emmons

Collection, Estate Planning, Family Law, Landlord-Tenant
Status:  In Good Standing           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Maximilian R. Goldberg

Personal Injury, Family Law, Education, Federal Appellate Practice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  21 Years

Louis M. Diesel

Traffic, Family Law, Civil Rights, Personal Injury, Professional Malpractice
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  51 Years

Ted S. Reed

Business Organization, Family Law, Wills & Probate, Corporate
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  20 Years

Elliot Randal Alford

Intellectual Property, Immigration, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  12 Years

Benjamin L Deguire

Copyright, Medicare & Medicaid, Family Law, Juvenile Law
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  24 Years

Benjamin L Deguire

Mediation, Family Law, Juvenile Law, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           

Adam K Zickerman

Trusts, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  21 Years

Bryon Middlebrook

Traffic, Lawsuit & Dispute, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law
Status:  In Good Standing           Licensed:  39 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-620-0900

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-620-0900

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

TIPS

Easily find Parks Family Law Lawyers and Parks Family Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Divorce & Family Law areas including Adoption, Child Custody, Child Support and Divorce attorneys.

LEGAL TERMS

IN CAMERA

Latin for 'in chambers.' A legal proceeding is 'in camera' when a hearing is held before the judge in her private chambers or when the public is excluded from t... (more...)
Latin for 'in chambers.' A legal proceeding is 'in camera' when a hearing is held before the judge in her private chambers or when the public is excluded from the courtroom. Proceedings are often held in camera to protect victims and witnesses from public exposure, especially if the victim or witness is a child. There is still, however, a record made of the proceeding, typically by a court stenographer. The judge may decide to seal this record if the material is extremely sensitive or likely to prejudice one side or the other.

PHYSICAL CUSTODY

The right and obligation of a parent to have his child live with him. Compare legal custody.

DILUTION

A situation in which a famous trademark or service mark is used in a context in which the mark's reputation for quality is tarnished or its distinction is blurr... (more...)
A situation in which a famous trademark or service mark is used in a context in which the mark's reputation for quality is tarnished or its distinction is blurred. In this case, trademark infringement exists even though there is no likelihood of customer confusion, which is usually required in cases of trademark infringement. For example, the use of the word Candyland for a pornographic site on the Internet was ruled to dilute the reputation of the Candyland mark for the well-known children's game, even though the traditional basis for trademark infringement (probable customer confusion) wasn't an issue.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

An order from a judge that directs a party to come to court and convince the judge why she shouldn't grant an action proposed by the other side or by the judge ... (more...)
An order from a judge that directs a party to come to court and convince the judge why she shouldn't grant an action proposed by the other side or by the judge on her own (sua sponte). For example, in a divorce, at the request of one parent a judge might issue an order directing the other parent to appear in court on a particular date and time to show cause why the first parent should not be given sole physical custody of the children. Although it would seem that the person receiving an order to show cause is at a procedural disadvantage--she, after all, is the one who is told to come up with a convincing reason why the judge shouldn't order something--both sides normally have an equal chance to convince the judge to rule in their favor.

HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD

A person who supports and maintains, in one household, one or more people who are closely related to him by blood, marriage or adoption. Under federal income ta... (more...)
A person who supports and maintains, in one household, one or more people who are closely related to him by blood, marriage or adoption. Under federal income tax law, you are eligible for favorable tax treatment as the head of household only if you are unmarried and you manage a household which is the principal residence (for more than half of the year) of dependent children or other dependent relatives. Under bankruptcy homestead and exemption laws, the terms householder and 'head of household' mean the same thing. Examples include a single woman supporting her disabled sister and her own children or a bachelor supporting his parents. Many states consider a single person supporting only himself to be a head of household as well.

DESERTION

The voluntary abandonment of one spouse by the other, without the abandoned spouse's consent. Commonly, desertion occurs when a spouse leaves the marital home f... (more...)
The voluntary abandonment of one spouse by the other, without the abandoned spouse's consent. Commonly, desertion occurs when a spouse leaves the marital home for a specified length of time. Desertion is a grounds for divorce in states with fault divorce.

STIRPES

A term used in wills that refers to descendants of a common ancestor or branch of a family.

MARTIAL MISCONDUCT

See fault divorce.

DIVORCE AGREEMENT

An agreement made by a divorcing couple regarding the division of property, custody and visitation of the children, alimony or child support. The agreement must... (more...)
An agreement made by a divorcing couple regarding the division of property, custody and visitation of the children, alimony or child support. The agreement must be put in writing, signed by the parties and accepted by the court. It becomes part of the divorce decree and does away with the necessity of having a trial on the issues covered by the agreement. A divorce agreement may also be called a marital settlement agreement, marital termination agreement or settlement agreement.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Kline v. Kline

... B. Pleading Standards. ¶ 13 The Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure generally apply to all family law cases pending as of January 1, 2006. ... [1] Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure. [2] It is remarkable that a case so actively litigated would result in a default judgment. ...

Craig v. Craig

... Husband timely filed a motion for new trial or to amend the decree under Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure 83 and 84. Before the court ruled on Husband's motion, however, Wife filed a notice of appeal. Husband then cross-appealed. ...

Ezell v. Quon

... Quon. Moreover, when Quon failed to petition for review of this court's dismissal of his appeal for lack of jurisdiction, it became the law of the case and he is precluded from challenging that ruling here. See State v. Kiles, 222 Ariz. ...