Red Oak Estate Lawyer, Texas
SPONSORED LAWYERS
1-2 of 2 matches. Page 1 of 1
510 Azalea Dr, Red Oak, TX 75154
Profile LAWPOINTS™19/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
Susan Mellina Hayslip
Commercial Real Estate, Public Finance, Wills, Family Law
Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years
316 Brookbend Dr, Waxahachie, TX 75165
Profile LAWPOINTS™19/100
LAWPOINTS™ measure the overall completeness of a Lawyer's profile. More complete profiles are ranked higher and help visitors select the right lawyer faster.
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
We help paid Members build more complete and informative profiles.
LAWPOINTS™ do not measure a Lawyer's reputation.
More Info for Lawyers
TIPS
Lawyer.com can help you easily and quickly find Red Oak Estate Lawyers and Red Oak Estate Law Firms. Refine your search by specific Estate practice areas such as Estate Planning, Trusts, Wills & Probate and Power of Attorney matters.
LEGAL TERMS
ADEMPTION
The failure of a bequest of property in a will. The gift fails (is 'adeemed') because the person who made the will no longer owns the property when he or she di... (more...)
The failure of a bequest of property in a will. The gift fails (is 'adeemed') because the person who made the will no longer owns the property when he or she dies. Often this happens because the property has been sold, destroyed or given away to someone other than the beneficiary named in the will. A bequest may also be adeemed when the will maker, while still living, gives the property to the intended beneficiary (called 'ademption by satisfaction'). When a bequest is adeemed, the beneficiary named in the will is out of luck; he or she doesn't get cash or a different item of property to replace the one that was described in the will. For example, Mark writes in his will, 'I leave to Rob the family vehicle,' but then trades in his car in for a jet ski. When Mark dies, Rob will receive nothing. Frustrated beneficiaries may challenge an ademption in court, especially if the property was not clearly identified in the first place.
PROVING A WILL
Convincing a probate court that a document is truly the deceased person's will. Usually this is a simple formality that the executor or administrator easily sat... (more...)
Convincing a probate court that a document is truly the deceased person's will. Usually this is a simple formality that the executor or administrator easily satisfies by showing that the will was signed and dated by the deceased person in front of two or more witnesses. When the will is holographic -- that is, completely handwritten by the deceased and not witnessed, it is still valid in many states if the executor can produce relatives and friends to testify that the handwriting is that of the deceased.
RESIDUARY BENEFICIARY
A person who receives any property by a will or trust that is not specifically left to another designated beneficiary. For example, if Antonio makes a will leav... (more...)
A person who receives any property by a will or trust that is not specifically left to another designated beneficiary. For example, if Antonio makes a will leaving his home to Edwina and the remainder of his property to Elmo, then Elmo is the residuary beneficiary.
POUR-OVER WILL
A will that 'pours over' property into a trust when the will maker dies. Property left through the will must go through probate before it goes into the trust.
BENEFICIARY
A person or organization legally entitled to receive benefits through a legal device, such as a will, trust or life insurance policy.
SECONDARY MEANING
In trademark law, a mark that is not inherently distinctive becomes protected after developing a 'secondary meaning': great public recognition through long use ... (more...)
In trademark law, a mark that is not inherently distinctive becomes protected after developing a 'secondary meaning': great public recognition through long use and exposure in the marketplace. For example, though first names are not generally considered inherently distinctive, Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream has become so well known that it is now entitled to maximum trademark protection.
DEVISEE
A person or entity who inherits real estate under the terms of a will.
SPRINKLING TRUST
A trust that gives the person managing it (the trustee) the discretion to disburse its funds among the beneficiaries in any way he or she sees fit.
RULE AGAINST PERPETUITIES
An exceedingly complex legal doctrine that limits the amount of time that property can be controlled after death by a person's instructions in a will. For examp... (more...)
An exceedingly complex legal doctrine that limits the amount of time that property can be controlled after death by a person's instructions in a will. For example, a person would not be allowed to leave property to her husband for his life, then to her children for their lives, then to her grandchildren. The gift would potentially go to the grandchildren at a point too remote in time.
SAMPLE LEGAL CASES
In re Estate of Tyner
Lacey Westbrook appeals from an adverse summary judgment rendered in the declaratory judgment
action she initiated to have JW Tyner's will construed. Westbrook contends the trial court erroneously
determined that she is not a beneficiary under the will, set the wrong postjudgment ...
In re Estate of Rhea
In October 2005, Charlotte and Trenton notified Charles of their intent to remove Wanda's personal
property from the marital home. Charles labeled some of the possessions in the home to mark
his own separate property, then left the house from November 11 through November 14. ...
In re Estate of Gaines
In eight issues, appellants argue (1) the trial court improperly disqualified Davis from serving
as the independent executor because no motion to disqualify or opposition was filed, (2) the
trial court erred in requiring Davis to turn over funds, (3) the trial court erred in denying ...
FILTER BY:
- Free Consultation
- Male
- Female
- Suspended
PRACTICE AREAS
- Accident & Injury
- Bankruptcy & Debt
- Business
- Civil & Human Rights
- Consumer Rights
- Criminal
- Divorce & Family Law
- Employment
- Environmental Law
- Estate
- -Estate Planning
- -Gift Taxation
- -Trusts
- -Wills & Probate
- -Estate Administration
- -Living Wills
- -Wills
- -Power of Attorney
- Government
- Health Care
- Immigration
- Industry Specialties
- Intellectual Property
- International
- Lawsuit & Dispute
- Mass Torts
- Motor Vehicle
- Real Estate
- Tax
- Other