Ruth Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Richard L. Williams
About | Practice Areas
The Williams Law Firm
411 W Lake Lansing Rd Ste C-110 East Lansing, MI 48823» view map
Criminal Defense Law
A Defense Lawyer With Proven Results

Knowing the law certainly is a necessary prerequisite but an attorney’s ability to effectively communicate is perhaps his or her paramount importance.

800-945-0701
1. Richard L. Williams East Lansing, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 1978
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School J.D.
2. AboutThe Williams Law Firm
  We stop at nothing to get what we want.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

James A. Marcus

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 58 Years

CONTACT

6440 Applegate Rd, Applegate, MI 48401

Julienne Michelle Ferris

Juvenile Law, Real Estate, Motor Vehicle, Lawsuit & Dispute

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

237 E Huron Ave, Bad Axe, MI 48413

Andrew R. Lockard

Estate, Family Law, Criminal, Credit & Debt

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

225 E Woodworth St, Bad Axe, MI 48413

Dallas Leroy Rooney

Landlord-Tenant, Motor Vehicle, Lawsuit & Dispute, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

129 N Heisterman St, Bad Axe, MI 48413

Michelle Ramona Siev

Criminal, Contract

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 8 Years

CONTACT

125 N Heisterman St, Bad Axe, MI 48413

Michael Andrew Murawski

Other, Real Estate, Estate Planning, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

305 E Huron Ave, Bad Axe, MI 48413

Timothy J. Rutkowski

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

250 E Huron Ave, Bad Axe, MI 48413

Gerald M. Prill

Government, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

250 E Huron Ave, Bad Axe, MI 48413

Walter J. Salens

Criminal, Elder Law, Civil & Human Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

125 N Heisterman St, Bad Axe, MI 48413

Elizabeth Virginia Weisenbach

Traffic, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

128 W Huron Ave, Bad Axe, MI 48413

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

BAIL

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all requi... (more...)

The money paid to the court, usually at arraignment or shortly thereafter, to ensure that an arrested person who is released from jail will show up at all required court appearances. The amount of bail is determined by the local bail schedule, which is based on the seriousness of the offense. The judge can increase the bail if the prosecutor convinces him that the defendant is likely to flee (for example, if he has failed to show up in court in the past), or he can decrease it if the defense attorney shows that the defendant is unlikely to run (for example, he has strong ties to the community by way of a steady job and a family).

ACCOMPLICE

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An ... (more...)

Someone who helps another person (known as the principal) commit a crime. Unlike an accessory, an accomplice is usually present when the crime is committed. An accomplice is guilty of the same offense and usually receives the same sentence as the principal. For instance, the driver of the getaway car for a burglary is an accomplice and will be guilty of the burglary even though he may not have entered the building.

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Ruth Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

The Williams Law Firm

SPONSORED LAWYERS

James A. Marcus

Julienne Michelle Ferris

Andrew R. Lockard

Dallas Leroy Rooney

Michelle Ramona Siev

Michael Andrew Murawski

Timothy J. Rutkowski

Gerald M. Prill

Walter J. Salens

Elizabeth Virginia Weisenbach

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HUNG JURY

DIRECTED VERDICT

MENS REA

INDECENT EXPOSURE

BAIL

ACCOMPLICE

CONTINGENCY FEE

PROSECUTE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

People v. Petri

People v. Horn

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details